Does this paragraph about a falling cup make sense?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics project involving a falling cup with a mass at the bottom to ensure it lands upright. The initial explanation highlights how the heavier bottom half reduces air drag effects, allowing the cup to maintain its orientation during free fall. However, participants suggest that the explanation should incorporate the concept of torque, which involves the twisting forces acting on the cup due to gravity and air resistance. The idea is to visualize how these forces create a tendency to rotate the cup, affecting its stability during descent. Overall, a more thorough understanding of torque could enhance the explanation of the cup's behavior while falling.
TheExibo
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
A cup with a mass/weight at the bottom was filled with cotton and an egg was place inside for a physics project. As the cup was falling, it would always re position itself to fall with the bottom/heavier half first (the bottom contains the mass). Would it make sense to explain this case this way:

After a test drop with a plastic egg, the plastic cup had tipped over and landed on its side. This issue was resolved by placing a mass at the center of the bottom of a second cup, and placing the first cup on top. Because the bottom half of the device was now heavier, it would be less affected by air drag than the top half, and the egg-helmet would always position itself in mid-air with the heavier half at the bottom. This repositioning was a result of the collision with the cup and all the stationary air molecules in the way. The half with more mass will have more momentum to spare among the air molecules that it encounters, thus maintaining more speed than the lighter half.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's sort of right, but it would be better to explain it in terms of torque. Imagine the cup tilted somewhat while falling. Draw where you think the forces of gravity and drag will act.
 
haruspex said:
It's sort of right, but it would be better to explain it in terms of torque. Imagine the cup tilted somewhat while falling. Draw where you think the forces of gravity and drag will act.

How would you explain it using torque? I'm not familiar with what it is.
 
TheExibo said:
How would you explain it using torque? I'm not familiar with what it is.
Torque means a twisting force. If you have equal and opposite forces, but in different 'lines of action', the result will be a tendency to twist the object they're acting on.
In the case of this cup, as you say, the mass is concentrated towards the bottom, but the drag is not. Just draw a picture of a tilted rectangle with the drag acting upwards in the middle, but gravity acting downwards near the bottom end. Do you see the twisting effect?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top