Does this problem make sense? (Probability and Survey Sampling)

  • Thread starter Thread starter gjones89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sampling Survey
gjones89
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to answer a question for an assignment, but am convinced that it doesn't make sense. Please see here: http://img813.imageshack.us/img813/1585/qst.png

My problem is with Plan 2 in the question. The probability of selecting any of the 5 elements on the first selection is 1/5. So for example, I can select element 1 with probability 1/5 on the first pick. But then, how can I work out the probabilities of choosing the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th elements on the 2nd pick? Obviously these probabilities can't just be the numbers in the last column in the table, because if I add together the probabilties for choosing elements 2, 3, 4, and 5 (ignoring row 1 because we are sampling without replacement), I get (1/4 + 1/2 + 1/5 + 7/40) = 9/8, i.e. a total greater than one!

What is going on here? I want to work out the probability of picking, for example, element 1 on the first pick and element 2 on the second pick. Can anyone help?

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand problem correctly then
P(S[2]=i)=P(S[2]=i|S[1]\neqi)*P(S[1]\neqi)

so for i=1 then

P(S[2]=1)=(1/8)*(4/5)


will be the same method for other elements
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top