Does this problem make sense to anyone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drew777
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a rotational equilibrium problem involving a uniform rod of 200 cm length and a weight of 50 dynes. An upward force of 200 dynes is applied 15 cm from the right edge, prompting the need to determine the point of rotation. The initial calculations presented by the user were incorrect, leading to confusion about the torque balance. A correct approach involves setting the torques equal for clockwise and counter-clockwise moments around a pivot point. The solution concludes that the rod will rotate about a point located 168 cm from the left end.
Drew777
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Uniform rod 200cm in legth is in equilibrium. An upward force of 200 dynes is applied 15 cm from the right edge. If the rod is 50dynes. At what pint will rod rotate about?




The Attempt at a Solution

Just one of many

-50(100)+200(185)
-5000+37000
=32000
32000/150
= 213.33 ?

What am I missing? Please I need help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Drew777 said:

Homework Statement



Uniform rod 200cm in legth is in equilibrium. An upward force of 200 dynes is applied 15 cm from the right edge. If the rod is 50dynes. At what pint will rod rotate about?

The Attempt at a Solution

Just one of many

-50(100)+200(185)
-5000+37000
=32000
32000/150
= 213.33 ?

What am I missing? Please I need help.

Hi there! This sounds like a rotational equilibrium problem! Below is my rationale -

1) Set a horizontal axis zero point at the left end-point of the rod. Therefore, we have the center of gravity of the rod at 100cm, and we have the point of upward force at 185cm.

2) Set the point of rotation at location X, (i.e. X cm from the left end-point).

3) Given the system is at equilibrium, therefore the torque moving the rod at clock-wise direction (produced by upward lift force at 185cm), equals to the torque moving the rod at counter-clock-wise direction (weight of the rod, at the center of gravity, at 100cm). This is the foundation for setting the equation to solve for X.

4) Setting equations: Torque CW = Torque CCW
=> 50*(X-100)=200*(185-X)
=> X=168cm
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top