Does this solution exhibits resonance

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElDavidas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resonance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining if the general solution to the equation \ddot{x} + \omega^2{}_{0} = cos( \omega t) exhibits resonance. The provided solution is x = A sin( \omega_{0}t) + B cos (\omega_{0}t) + \frac {1} {\omega_0^2 - \omega^2} cos (\omega t). The key point is that resonance occurs when the driving frequency \omega approaches the natural frequency \omega_0, which is indicated by the denominator approaching zero. The exclusion of the case where \omega equals \omega_0 means exact resonance is not considered. Understanding the behavior of the solution as \omega approaches \omega_0 is crucial for analyzing resonance.
ElDavidas
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
In a question, I've been asked to find the general solution of the equation:

\ddot{x} + \omega^2{}_{0} = cos( \omega t)

(\omega , \omega_{0} > 0, \omega \neq \omega_{0})

I've found the solution to this.

It then asks me if this solution exhibits resonance. What does this mean and how do you determine this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you found the solution then it should be apparent whether it exhibits resonance. It might be helpful if you displayed your solution here.

Incidentally, if you have excluded the possibility of \omega = \omega_0 then you have excluded the possibility of [exact] resonance! :)
 
Tide said:
It might be helpful if you displayed your solution here.

Ok, this is my answer:

x = A sin( \omega_{0}t) + B cos (\omega_{0}t) + \frac {1} {\omega_0^2 - \omega^2} cos (\omega t)
 
Last edited:
The denominator of the last term is what you're after. What happens to the solution as \omega -> \omega_0? I'll try to find you a legendary video of resonant behaviour.edit: here's a small clip http://www.camerashoptacoma.com/mpegs/TacomaNarrowsBridge.mpg
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top