Does Throwing an Object Overboard Affect Pond Water Level?

AI Thread Summary
Throwing an object overboard from a boat affects the water level in a pond. When the object is in the boat, it contributes to the weight and volume of water displaced. Once thrown overboard, the object sinks, displacing less water due to its higher density compared to water. The conclusion is that the water level will fall when the object is removed from the boat. This reasoning clarifies the misconception that a denser object would displace more water when thrown overboard.
TomK
Messages
69
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
Archimedes' Principle.
Relevant Equations
upthrust = weight of water displaced
density = mass/volume
volume of object submerged = volume of water displaced
mass x g = weight
I was asked this question:

Assume you're sitting in a boat (you and the boat, together, are a mass M) which also contains a heavy object (of mass m). The boat (inc. you and the heavy object) is floating in a pond (a fixed body of water, rather than open sea). If you throw the object overboard (it sinks) and remain seated in the boat, will the water level of the pond rise, fall, or stay the same?

Below, I have given my proposed answer, and I wanted to ask if it made sense:

When the object is in the boat: weight of displaced water = (M+m)g = (M+Vd)g
This is because masses M and m are both floating.

volume x density = mass
d = density of object
V = volume of objectWhen the object is thrown overboard: weight of displaced water = (M+1000V)g
This is because the volume of submerged object = volume of water displaced by object.

Assumes density of water = 1000kgm^-3Comparing the two equations: We know d (density of object) is greater than 1000, because the object sinks in water.
When the object is thrown overboard, the weight (and volume) of displaced water decreases.
Therefore, the water level must have fallen.

Is this the correct conclusion to make? Could you prove this scenario in-practice, or would your boat not stay afloat with the object in it?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
TomK said:
Is this the correct conclusion to make?
The reasoning is correct.
TomK said:
would your boat not stay afloat with the object in it?
Do you think that having an object denser than water in a boat would necessarily make it sink?
TomK said:
M+1000V
Better to write M+ρwV, or, if you must substitute numbers, quote units: M+(1000V kg/m3).
 
Thank you for the response. This answers my question.

I think my misconception came from thinking that the object (more dense than water) would have to be sufficiently heavy to displace more water when thrown overboard.

However, my working shows that, under the assumed circumstances, m could really be any value and the water level would still change (though it would have to be heavy to make a measurable difference in real-life).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top