Does Throwing an Object Overboard Affect Pond Water Level?

AI Thread Summary
Throwing an object overboard from a boat affects the water level in a pond. When the object is in the boat, it contributes to the weight and volume of water displaced. Once thrown overboard, the object sinks, displacing less water due to its higher density compared to water. The conclusion is that the water level will fall when the object is removed from the boat. This reasoning clarifies the misconception that a denser object would displace more water when thrown overboard.
TomK
Messages
69
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
Archimedes' Principle.
Relevant Equations
upthrust = weight of water displaced
density = mass/volume
volume of object submerged = volume of water displaced
mass x g = weight
I was asked this question:

Assume you're sitting in a boat (you and the boat, together, are a mass M) which also contains a heavy object (of mass m). The boat (inc. you and the heavy object) is floating in a pond (a fixed body of water, rather than open sea). If you throw the object overboard (it sinks) and remain seated in the boat, will the water level of the pond rise, fall, or stay the same?

Below, I have given my proposed answer, and I wanted to ask if it made sense:

When the object is in the boat: weight of displaced water = (M+m)g = (M+Vd)g
This is because masses M and m are both floating.

volume x density = mass
d = density of object
V = volume of objectWhen the object is thrown overboard: weight of displaced water = (M+1000V)g
This is because the volume of submerged object = volume of water displaced by object.

Assumes density of water = 1000kgm^-3Comparing the two equations: We know d (density of object) is greater than 1000, because the object sinks in water.
When the object is thrown overboard, the weight (and volume) of displaced water decreases.
Therefore, the water level must have fallen.

Is this the correct conclusion to make? Could you prove this scenario in-practice, or would your boat not stay afloat with the object in it?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
TomK said:
Is this the correct conclusion to make?
The reasoning is correct.
TomK said:
would your boat not stay afloat with the object in it?
Do you think that having an object denser than water in a boat would necessarily make it sink?
TomK said:
M+1000V
Better to write M+ρwV, or, if you must substitute numbers, quote units: M+(1000V kg/m3).
 
Thank you for the response. This answers my question.

I think my misconception came from thinking that the object (more dense than water) would have to be sufficiently heavy to displace more water when thrown overboard.

However, my working shows that, under the assumed circumstances, m could really be any value and the water level would still change (though it would have to be heavy to make a measurable difference in real-life).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top