Does Traveling at Light Speed Affect Fuel Consumption and Time Dilation?

daz59
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Something I was wondering, since time slows down as we approach the speed of light. Say a person in a ship travailing close to the speed of light only ages by one hour when the rest of the Earth ages by 100 years, does that mean the ship only uses one hours worth of fuel? But travels 100 years relative to earth?

Darren
 
Physics news on Phys.org
daz59 said:
Say a person in a ship travailing close to the speed of light only ages by one hour when the rest of the Earth ages by 100 years, does that mean the ship only uses one hours worth of fuel? But travels 100 years relative to earth?

Darren
if it's not accelerating it won't use any fuel
 
According to special theory of relativity, when speed limits to speed of light, energy (kinetic energy) limits to infinity. because mass limits to infinity.

m2 = m1 / SQRT(1 - (v/c)^2)

*when we approach the speed of light, necessary amount of energy is too much !
 
daz59 said:
Something I was wondering, since time slows down as we approach the speed of light. Say a person in a ship travailing close to the speed of light only ages by one hour when the rest of the Earth ages by 100 years, does that mean the ship only uses one hours worth of fuel? But travels 100 years relative to earth?

Darren
The short answer to your question is yes. It is true that the ship, along with everything and everyone in it, will experience a mere one hour passing.

You can also see a mind-boggling implication of this: that star that was 100+ light years away when you were on Earth, is now much, MUCH closer (this is the length contraction component to relativity), which is why it can be reached with a mere hour of fuel expended.


But

As others are pointing out, it's not that easy. Reaching speeds that manifest that amount of time dilation would burn through an unimaginable amount of fuel - even if it could be done - which it can't. The journey specified requires starting out at Earth and achieviing infinite acceleration to .99999+ c (such that there is no ramp up component to your speed) and then reversing at the other end so that you spend your entire 100ly-in-1h journey at .99999+c. Your passengers and equipment will be vapourized.

As you make your experiment more realistic, you will see that the journey must become a long rampup to ~c and then a long ramp down to 0. The time dilation is still significant, but the fuel expended becomes nigh-unimaginably large.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top