Does Vitamin Supplement Impact Birth Weight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghost305
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistics
ghost305
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
10. The birth weights (in kilograms) are recorded for a sample of male babies born to mothers taking a special vitamin supplement (based on data from the New York Department of Health). When testing the claim that the mean birth weight for all male babies of mothers given vitamins is equal to 3.39kg, which is the mean weight of the population of all male babies, a sample of 16 babies had a mean of 3.675kg and a standard deviation of 0.657. Based on these results, does the vitamin supplement appear to have any effect on the mean birth weight?
Use the 0.01 level of significance.
Null Hypothesis: H0: µ = 3.39kg
Alternate Hypothesis: HA µ ≠ 3.39 kg
Two sided test: 99% C.I
Z = 3.675± 2.575 * 0.657
Z (1.983, 5.366)
Since M0 falls inside this confidence interval, we cannot reject the Null Hypothesis. at 1% level of significance we can reject Ha.Did i get it right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Some comments

1) You shouldn't write "Z = " and then give a confidence interval; the appropriate test statistic should be calculated

2) For a sample of n = 16 observations, and with only the sample standard deviation given ("a sample of ... a standard deviation of 0.657") you should use the 1-sample t rather than the 1-sample Z. the test statistic is

<br /> t = \frac{\bar X - \mu_0}{\dfrac s {\sqrt n}}<br />

3) Since the question is "does the vitamin supplement have any effect ...", the appropriate
hypothesis is indeed two-sided, and you have it correct. Many people would
automatically use ">"
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top