Programs Doing a Physics PhD without a Physics Undergrad Degree?

AI Thread Summary
Graduating with an MChem degree opens various pathways for pursuing a PhD, including fields like Nuclear Physics and Photon/Laser Physics. While there is some flexibility in transitioning from chemistry to physics, acceptance into specific programs often depends on the courses completed during the undergraduate degree. A background in physical chemistry is generally viewed as adequate for admission to physics graduate programs, but candidates should verify the requirements of individual schools. Additional self-study may be necessary to bridge knowledge gaps, especially for less related fields like astrophysics or particle physics. Overall, a strong academic record in chemistry from a reputable university can demonstrate the potential to succeed in diverse scientific disciplines.
Nomad_91
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi

I will be graduating with an MChem (4 year integrated Masters Chemistry Degree) next year and I'm thinking about potential PhD's to go into. I was just wandering what kind of flexibility you have in choosing what field you go into. I was looking at some programmes in physics that have caught my eye but i don't know whether they will accept a chemistry graduate or not. As you may know they are different fields but with quite a great deal of overlap and i have studied many of the same fields (albeit in different amount of detail and with a different focus) as physics graduates.

I understand that i will be required to do some extra reading to catch up in some case but as you're already expected to do a large amount of research anyway i don't really see it as an issue for me. Also i am interested in the fields that i have already come across before and have some knowledge on and not ones that i have absolutely no clue about. More specifically I'm looking at Nuclear Physics and Photon/Laser Physics. However there are some less related fields
that I'm also interested in and i would bring myself up to scratch in my year out of academia after i finish my current degree if i were to pursue these further (astrophysics or particle physics).

So what is the consensus? Are graduates expected to go only into the field they graduated in or is there some flexibility? Would a physics graduate be preferred over myself because of his/her background? I believe having a first degree in Chemistry from a well respected university should show i have the potential required to undertake a PhD in any field.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a pinned thread at the top of this section of the forum for just your situation. You might want to check it out. Lots of great information in there.
 
It will depend on what courses you've taken. Generally speaking a degree in physical chemistry would be considered sufficient for admission to a physics graduate program, but you'll have to look into this at the specific schools you're interested in applying to.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top