Domain of a function - f(x,y)=root(1-x)+root(1-y)

  • Thread starter Thread starter FOIWATER
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain Function
AI Thread Summary
The function f(x,y) = √(1-x) + √(1-y) is defined for x and y values ranging from negative infinity up to and including 1. The discussion explores the domain as a 2D problem in the x-y plane, suggesting that the intersection of the domains for x and y forms a rectangular area. The participants clarify that for real numbers, x and y must be less than or equal to 1 to avoid undefined values under the square root. There is some confusion about visualizing this in three-dimensional space, but the focus remains on the 2D representation. Overall, the domain is confirmed to be the set of real numbers where both x and y are less than or equal to 1.
FOIWATER
Gold Member
Messages
434
Reaction score
12
I have came up with a solution for this - in order for this function to be defined, we must have an x and y between negative infinity up to and including the number 1.

If asked to graph this domain, does the domain lie on the x-y plane of three dimensional space, and is it the intersection of the domains of x and y?

I know the only sensible way to my question will likely go over my head - I Just started vector calculus - so no worries, I find it difficult for this to make sense to me.

I am thinking of the domain as the values "under" the z-plane in 3d space, if that makes any sense... at all - or above! or maybe a point in three-d space is ON the plane, when z is zero?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
i think this is simplay a 2D problem in x and y unless you want to make it 3D by stating f(x,y)=z

next what does the root(1-x) mean? I don't understand how to even plot this if I could.
 
well it's 1-x all under a square root sign

root(1-x) = sqrt(1-x)

you know?
 
okay got it so that's why x>1 or y>1 is out of bounds if you're dealing with real numbers but okay for complex numbers.

so I got a sideways parabola from ending at z=0 x=1 y=1

You might google on graph 3D calculator and try your formula. I did but I didnt have the flash plugin installed (I'm on linux) so I had to imagine how it looks rotating the x curve around (1,1,0)
 
really..hmm.. I got a rectangular plane - I don't think we are considering z here? hold it constant, and just focus on y and x right?

so we have x and y have both to be less than or equal to negative one. So they intersect on a rectangular plane going back to negative infinity...?
 
Assuming you are just dealing in real numbers, your domain is simply to do with x and y and it is \{x,y \in\mathbb R: x \leq 1,\ y \leq 1\}
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top