Don't have point B (cycle process)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ~christina~
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Process
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating thermodynamic properties for a cycle involving one mole of helium gas in a cylinder with a movable piston. Participants are attempting to determine the internal energy change, heat transferred, and work performed for each segment of the cycle, specifically focusing on the unknown state at point B. Key equations such as the ideal gas law and relationships for isothermal, isobaric, and adiabatic processes are referenced. The conversation includes attempts to derive values for pressure and volume at point B using equations relating to the cycle's segments. Ultimately, the participants are guided to use their established equations to solve for the unknowns and calculate the necessary thermodynamic quantities.
~christina~
Gold Member
Messages
714
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


One mole of helium is enclosed in a cylinder with a movable piston. By placing the cylinder in contact with various reservoirs and also insulating it at proper times, the helium performs a cycle. Compute the internal energy change, heat transferred, and work perfomed for each segment of the cyle and the total amount of each of these quantities for the entire cyle. Assume helium to be an ideal gas.

http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/4843/graphnc4.th.jpg


Homework Equations


\Delta U= Q + W

PV= nRT
Q= nC_p \Delta T

Q= nC_v \Delta T

\gamma= C_p / C_v = 1.67

C_v= 3/2R

C_p= 5/2R

The Attempt at a Solution



B is unknown but not sure how to find it...

I do have Parts:

A=> P= 8.00x10^4Pa, V= 2.00m^3

B=> P= ? V=?

C=> P= 3.00x10^4 Pa, V= 5.00m^3

D=> P= 3.00x10^4 Pa, V= 2.00m^3

For DA which is isovolumetric
w= 0

\Delta U= Q for U

\Delta Q= nCv (T_D-T_A) for finding heat (Q)

\Delta E_{int}= C_v \Delta T => however I'm not given T so what do I do?

do I use PV= nRT and then solve for T since I have P and V ? so
\Delta P V /nR = \Delta T

For CD which is Isobaric
P= constant
W= -P(V_F-V_i) for the internal E

\E_{int}= Q + W for the work

PV= nRT

Q= nCP \Delta T

\E _{int}= ? not sure about this

For the part AB It is isothermic

T= constant
T_A= T_B

\Delta U= nR\Delta T= 0 internal Energy which is = 0

so based on above Q= -W to find the heat

P_A= 8.00x10^4 Pa
P_A= 2.00 m^3

W= nRT ( /frac{V_A} {V_B}) => don't have V for the final VB

For part BC

It's adiabatic so Q= 0 thus
\Delta U= W

point B is not known (P or V) initial point

C=> P= 3.00x10^4 Pa, V= 5.00m^3

P_iV_i^{\gamma} = P_iV_f^{\gamma}

not sure how to find the \Delta U and that would also = W but if I don't find those then how can I find the W?

Point B

I don't have the P or V for point B so I'm not exactly sure how to find the info I need.

I think that for the \Delta U= 0

P_iV_i^{\gamma} = P_fV_f^{\gamma}

so I think I can find the V and P. But don't you have to be given \gamma ? or is it a constant?

Well after finding the Pf I was thinking of using the fact that the AB is isothermic and plugging into this..

Q= W= P_AV_A ln (V_B/V_A)

Is this it..I think so but I think I'm missing some things here and there on actually solving this with numbers.

Could someone check it for me?

Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
~christina~ said:
Point B

I don't have the P or V for point B so I'm not exactly sure how to find the info I need.
Here's a tip about finding point B. Point A and B are connected via an isothermal. Similarly, point C and B are connected via an adiabatic expansion. That should allow you to find P and V for point B.
 
Doc Al said:
Here's a tip about finding point B. Point A and B are connected via an isothermal. Similarly, point C and B are connected via an adiabatic expansion. That should allow you to find P and V for point B.

I don't know but I tried to find the volume for b by the equation that I used above but I'm not sure what gamma is and I still don't know how to find the pressure for b.
 
Treat the helium as an ideal monoatomic gas--that should tell you what gamma is.

Relating point A to point B (isothermal):
P_a V_a = P_b V_b

Relating point C to point B (adiabatic):
P_c V_c^{\gamma} = P_b V_b^{\gamma}

Two equations; two unknowns. :wink:
 
Doc Al said:
Treat the helium as an ideal monoatomic gas--that should tell you what gamma is.

okay so \gamma= 1.67

Relating point A to point B (isothermal):
P_a V_a = P_b V_b

so I have the P_a= 8.00x10^4Pa and V_a= 2.00m^3
so P_aV_a= P_bV_b= 1.6x10^5Pa*m^3

Relating point C to point B (adiabatic):
P_c V_c^{\gamma} = P_b V_b^{\gamma}

well for this P_cV_c^{\gamma} = (3.00x10^4 Pa)(5.00m^3)^{1.67}= 4.40x10^5 Pa*m^3= P_b V_b^{\gamma}

Two equations; two unknowns. :wink:

um..:confused: what do I do now? I don't think I can substitute one into the other and or etc. Am I missing something else, Doc?
 
~christina~ said:
I don't think I can substitute one into the other and or etc.
Why not? Use one equation to write P_b in terms of V_b, then plug that into the second.
 
Doc Al said:
Why not? Use one equation to write P_b in terms of V_b, then plug that into the second.

okay, but I guess my algebra's then

this is what I did.

PaVa=PbVb then

P_b =1.6x10^5Pa*m^3 /V_b then I plug that into the other equation...

P_c V_c^{\gamma} = P_b V_b^{\gamma}

4.40x10^5 Pa*m^3= \frac{1.6x10^5Pa*m^3} {V_b} V_b^{\gamma}

and that would cancel the Vb? (I don't think so)
 
Recall this property of exponents:

\frac{X^a}{X^b} = X^{a-b}
 
unless you mean that

it would be..
4.40x10^5 Pa*m^3= \frac{1.6x10^5Pa*m^3} {V_b} V_b^{\gamma}

and so based on the rule that I forgot...

4.40x10^5 Pa*m^3= (1.6x10^5Pa*m^3) (V_b)^{\gamma-0}

is this correct?
 
  • #10
~christina~ said:
is this correct?
No.

\frac{X^a}{X} = \frac{X^a}{X^1} = X^{a-1}
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
No.

\frac{X^a}{X} = \frac{X^a}{X^1} = X^{a-1}

so it would be this...

4.40x10^5 Pa*m^3= (1.6x10^5Pa*m^3) (V_b)^{\gamma-1}
 
  • #12
~christina~ said:
so it would be this...

4.40x10^5 Pa*m^3= (1.6x10^5Pa*m^3) (V_b)^{\gamma-1}
Now you're cooking. :smile: (Although I didn't check your numbers.)

Now you should be able to solve for V_b (using a calculator, of course!).
 
  • #13
Doc Al said:
Now you're cooking. :smile: (Although I didn't check your numbers.)

Now you should be able to solve for V_b (using a calculator, of course!).
Okay so if that's like that then.

4.40x10^5 Pa*m^3= (1.6x10^5Pa*m^3) (V_b)^{\gamma-1}

2.75= Vb^{.67}
so
Vb= 4.52 m^3

and then since I have Vb

PaVa=PbVb

1.6x10^5 Pa m^3= Pb(4.52m^3)

Pb= 1.017x10^5Pa

um that looks funny though since the graph has Pa is 10^4...
 
  • #14
Yeah, something's not right. Check your values for volume: Realize that the values on the diagram need to be muliplied by 10^{-3}.
 
  • #15
so P_aV_a= P_bV_b= 1.6x10^2Pam^3

so then Pb= 1.6x10^2 Pam^3/Vb

P_cV_c^{\gamma} = (3.00x10^4 Pa)(5.00x10^-3)^{1.67}= 4.30 Pa*m^3= P_b V_b^{\gamma}

4.30 Pa*m^3= (1.6x10^2Pa m^3) (V_b)^{\gamma-1}

2.68x10^-2= V_b^{.67}

V_b= 4.52x10^-3 m^3

P_aV_a= P_bV_b

\frac{1.6x10^2Pam^3} {4.52x10^-3m^3} = P_b

P_b= 3.54x10^4 Pa

I think I got it.

Now to find the work what do I do? since I know that the point b) is both an isotherm and a adiabat.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
you didn't say whether this was right or not but assuming it is.

For DA which is isovolumetric
w= 0

\Delta U= Q for U

\Delta Q= nCv (T_D-T_A) for finding heat (Q)

\Delta U= C_v \Delta T => however I'm not given T so what do I do?

\Delta P V /nR = \Delta T

\Delta T= \frac{(8.00x10^4-3.00x10^4)(2x10^-3)} {(1mol)(8.314472 m3·Pa·K·mol)} = 6.013x10^3 K

and I think I take that and plug this below to find the E_{int}
and since Cv= 12.5 for He
\Delta U= nC_v \Delta T = 1mol(12.5)(6.013x10^3 K)= 7.516x10^4 J

and \Delta U= Q= 7.516x10^4 J right?

and W= 0
 
  • #17
For CD which is Isobaric
P= constant
W= -P(V_F-V_i) for the internal E

W= -(3.00x10^4Pa)(5.00x10^{-3}- 2.00x10^{-3})= -9x10^8 J

Q= nCP \Delta T
Q= (1mol)(20.8J/mol*K)= 20.8 J

\Delta U= Q + W for the work
so it would be

\Delta U= 20.8J + -9x10^8J= -8.99x10^8 J
 
  • #18
Last part.

For part BC

It's adiabatic so Q= 0 thus
\Delta U= W

Point C=> P_f= 3.00x10^4 Pa, V_f= 5.00m^3

P_iV_i^{\gamma} = P_iV_f^{\gamma}

I found the Vi and Pi though before (assuming their correct)

not sure how I find the work though...and it's equal to the U

so I need help on that. I think you have to take take the integral of the area under the curve but not sure how that would be set up unfortunately.


Thanks Doc Al :smile:
 
  • #19
~christina~ said:
so P_aV_a= P_bV_b= 1.6x10^2Pam^3

so then Pb= 1.6x10^2 Pam^3/Vb

P_cV_c^{\gamma} = (3.00x10^4 Pa)(5.00x10^-3)^{1.67}= 4.30 Pa*m^3= P_b V_b^{\gamma}

4.30 Pa*m^3= (1.6x10^2Pa m^3) (V_b)^{\gamma-1}

2.68x10^-2= V_b^{.67}

V_b= 4.52x10^-3 m^3

P_aV_a= P_bV_b

\frac{1.6x10^2Pam^3} {4.52x10^-3m^3} = P_b

P_b= 3.54x10^4 Pa

I think I got it.

Now to find the work what do I do? since I know that the point b) is both an isotherm and a adiabat.
Looks good! Be careful with terminology: On a P-V diagram only lines can be isotherms or adiabats, not points.
 
  • #20
~christina~ said:
you didn't say whether this was right or not but assuming it is.

For DA which is isovolumetric
w= 0

\Delta U= Q for U

\Delta Q= nCv (T_D-T_A) for finding heat (Q)

\Delta U= C_v \Delta T => however I'm not given T so what do I do?

\Delta P V /nR = \Delta T

\Delta T= \frac{(8.00x10^4-3.00x10^4)(2x10^-3)} {(1mol)(8.314472 m3·Pa·K·mol)} = 6.013x10^3 K

and I think I take that and plug this below to find the E_{int}
and since Cv= 12.5 for He
\Delta U= nC_v \Delta T = 1mol(12.5)(6.013x10^3 K)= 7.516x10^4 J

and \Delta U= Q= 7.516x10^4 J right?

and W= 0
Your methodology is correct, but redo your calculation of delta T and what follows. (You forgot to multiply by the volume.)
 
  • #21
~christina~ said:
For CD which is Isobaric
P= constant
W= -P(V_F-V_i) for the internal E
This is work, not internal energy (of course).

W= -(3.00x10^4Pa)(5.00x10^{-3}- 2.00x10^{-3})= -9x10^8 J
Redo this calculation. Also, since the gas is being compressed, the work done on it will be positive.

Q= nCP \Delta T
Q= (1mol)(20.8J/mol*K)= 20.8 J
Redo this. What's delta T?

\Delta U= Q + W for the work
so it would be

\Delta U= 20.8J + -9x10^8J= -8.99x10^8 J
You'll have to redo this, given the above.
 
  • #22
~christina~ said:
Last part.

For part BC

It's adiabatic so Q= 0 thus
\Delta U= W

Point C=> P_f= 3.00x10^4 Pa, V_f= 5.00m^3

P_iV_i^{\gamma} = P_iV_f^{\gamma}

I found the Vi and Pi though before (assuming their correct)

not sure how I find the work though...and it's equal to the U

so I need help on that. I think you have to take take the integral of the area under the curve but not sure how that would be set up unfortunately.
Yes, you'll have to integrate:
W = -\int p dV

Hint: Write p as a function of V, taking advantage of pV^{\gamma} = C (where C is a constant).
 
  • #23
Doc Al said:
Looks good! Be careful with terminology: On a P-V diagram only lines can be isotherms or adiabats, not points.

oh okay.
Doc Al said:
Your methodology is correct, but redo your calculation of delta T and what follows. (You forgot to multiply by the volume.)

\Delta T= \frac{(8.00x10^4-3.00x10^4)(2x10^-3)} {(1mol)(8.314472 m3·Pa·K·mol)} = 12.027 K

\Delta U= nC_v \Delta T = 1mol(12.5)(12.027K)= J

\Delta U= Q= 150.3375 J

Doc Al said:
This is work, not internal energy (of course).
um yes :rolleyes:
Redo this calculation. Also, since the gas is being compressed, the work done on it will be positive.
Oh yeah, I forgot about that.

W= -(3.00x10^4Pa)(2.00x10^{-3}-5.00x10^{-3} )= 90 J


Redo this. What's delta T?
W=nR \Delta T

90J= 1mol (8.314472 m3·Pa·K·1·mol-1 )\Delta T

\frac{90J} {1mol (8.314472 m3·Pa·K·1·mol-1)}= 10.82K

Q= nCP \Delta T

Q= (1mol)(20.8J/mol*K)(10.82K)= 225.056 J

you'll have to redo this, given the above.
\Delta U= Q + W

\Delta U= 225.056J + 90J= 315.056 J

Doc Al said:
Yes, you'll have to integrate:
W = -\int p dV

Hint: Write p as a function of V, taking advantage of pV^{\gamma} = C (where C is a constant).

hm..my teacher gave us a hint on this part and he said to use PV=nRT though. I would say that relates to pV^{\gamma} = C but it doesn't include the gamma on the V so is it related?

I have issues with integration.

Thank you very much Doc Al :smile:
 
  • #24
Your numbers look much better.
~christina~ said:
hm..my teacher gave us a hint on this part and he said to use PV=nRT though. I would say that relates to pV^{\gamma} = C but it doesn't include the gamma on the V so is it related?
As far as finding the work done in an adiabatic process, I don't quite see the point of your teacher's hint. PV=nRT applies to all ideal gas processes, not just adiabatic ones.
I have issues with integration.
Give my previous suggestion a shot and try to set it up properly. Then we'll worry about doing the integration. (It will turn out to be an easy integral. :wink:)
 
  • #25
Doc Al said:
Your numbers look much better.

As far as finding the work done in an adiabatic process, I don't quite see the point of your teacher's hint. PV=nRT applies to all ideal gas processes, not just adiabatic ones.

Give my previous suggestion a shot and try to set it up properly. Then we'll worry about doing the integration. (It will turn out to be an easy integral. :wink:)

okay. (sorry about the late post-few tests this week)

W= -\int p dV= C \int \frac{dV} {V^{\gamma}}

and I think that's weird looking. Is it? (Okay I found this online but I'm not sure how they did the integration to get=> W= \frac{C(V_f^{1-\gamma}- V_i^{1-\gamma})} {1-\gamma}

Thank you Doc Al
 
Last edited:
  • #26
Well, what's the integral of x^n? Of x^{-n}?
 
  • #27
Doc Al said:
Well, what's the integral of x^n? Of x^{-n}?

\int x^n= \frac {x^{n+1}} {n+1} n not = -1

\int x^{-n}= \frac {x^{-n+1}} {-n+1} as long as x not = 1 but I think this one is wrong though.

Thanks Doc :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #28
All perfectly correct! If you think the second one is wrong, check it by taking the derivative of the answer. :wink:

Once you are convinced that both are correct, compare the second one with the integral you need for this problem.
 
  • #29
Doc Al said:
All perfectly correct! If you think the second one is wrong, check it by taking the derivative of the answer. :wink:

okay I did and the other with the negative is fine.

Once you are convinced that both are correct, compare the second one with the integral you need for this problem.

W= -\int p dV= C \int \frac{dV} {V^{\gamma}}
I was wondering if there was supposed to be a (-) in the second part above. (the example I saw on the net didn't but why is that?)

\int x^{-n}= \frac {x^{-n+1}} {-n+1}

\int x^{-n}= \frac {x^{1-n}} {1-n} rearranged

W= \frac{C(V_f^{1-\gamma}- V_i^{1-\gamma})} {1-\gamma}
well the last thing is that I wasn't getting how they had Vf and Vi but I figured it out that it's because of the initial and final Volumes BUT if the pressure is not constant then why don't we include Pi and Pf??

Thanks Doc
 
Last edited:
  • #30
Since PV^\gamma = C, P and V are not independent variables. We chose to evaluate \int Pdv using the variable V. But we could easily have changed variables and wrote it in term of P, in which case we would have used Pi & Pf.
 
  • #31
Since , P and V are not independent variables. We chose to evaluate using the variable But we could easily have changed variables and wrote it in term of P, in which case we would have used Pi & Pf.

I forgot AB for isothermal process

For the part AB It is isothermic

T= constant
T_A= T_B

\Delta U= nR\Delta T= 0 internal Energy which is = 0

Q=-W

P_A= 8.00x10^4 Pa
P_A= 2.00 m^3

W= nRT ( \frac{V_A} {V_B})

thanks
 
  • #32
~christina~ said:
W= nRT ( \frac{V_A} {V_B})
Almost. You're missing a natural log.
 
  • #33
Doc Al said:
Since PV^\gamma = C, P and V are not independent variables. We chose to evaluate \int Pdv using the variable V. But we could easily have changed variables and wrote it in term of P, in which case we would have used Pi & Pf.

Okay I think I get it.

Doc Al said:
Almost. You're missing a natural log.

W= nRT ln ( \frac{V_A} {V_B})


W= -\int p dV= C \int \frac{dV} {V^{\gamma}}

I think I get how it gets to this W= \frac{C(V_f^{1-\gamma}- V_i^{1-\gamma})} {1-\gamma}

is it negative because you are taking the integral of \frac{1} {V^{\gamma}} so it is actually V^{-\gamma} ?

if it is then why did you put a negative in the integral at the begining?

I know it's like the neverending thread, so I promise that that was my last question. :biggrin:

Thank You Doc Al.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
~christina~ said:
W= -\int p dV
If you're asking about the negative sign in this equation, it's there because you want the work done on the gas. \int p dV by itself is the work done by the gas.
 
  • #35
Doc Al said:
If you're asking about the negative sign in this equation, it's there because you want the work done on the gas. \int p dV by itself is the work done by the gas.

but if there is work that is done by the gas (vol increasing) then it should be + then ? (in this case)

I understand it as if the vol increases then there is work doen by the gas.

If the volume decreases then there is work on the gas.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • #36
\int p dv is the work done by the gas. When the volume increases, it's positive.

-\int p dv is the work done on the gas. When the volume increases, it's negative.

Either one is fine, depending upon the sign convention used in your course. In your first post you wrote:
\Delta U= Q + W

That tells me you want the second version, the work done on the gas.
 
  • #37
Doc Al said:
\int p dv is the work done by the gas. When the volume increases, it's positive.

-\int p dv is the work done on the gas. When the volume increases, it's negative.

Either one is fine, depending upon the sign convention used in your course. In your first post you wrote:

\Delta U= Q + W


That tells me you want the second version, the work done on the gas.

:rolleyes: I've gotten myself confused...I looked up this equation online and my teacher gave the class another equation and my book has the same one that I first posted.

so the only difference would be that it would be +/- in the end so if I made the calculations with in on the gas then the result would be (-).

but if the volume decreases then the work would be possitive

sooo, I've decided to use the one done on the gas.

Thanks very much for your explanation.
 
Back
Top