A Don't understand this function, s(cosξ + j sinξ) in my textbook

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter FrankJ777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Textbook
FrankJ777
Messages
140
Reaction score
6
My textbook for Advanced Electomagnetics, by Balinas has this identity.

cos θ = se^(jξ) = s( cos ξ + j sin ξ ).

I have no idea what they are saying. Is there an S funtion I'm not aware of?
I've looked back and forth, and he doesn't seem to explain it's use.

I've inserted a picture of the page, to provide context.
Hope I'm in the right section.

20200922_183034.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I assume ##j^2=-1##, right ? Then s is magnitude of complex number ##cos\theta_l## and ##\zeta## is its angle in Gauss plane.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
s is just a constant, and they use Euler's formula to convert the complex exponential.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
So they are just saying that cos θ can be se^(jξ) = s( cos ξ + j sin ξ ). Where s is any old constant?
They're just decomposing cos θ into a real and imaginary part?
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
FrankJ777 said:
They're just decomposing cos θ into a real and imaginary part?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top