Doped semiconductor, donor electron radius

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the radius of a donor electron's orbit in a doped semiconductor, with specific parameters including ε/ε0 = 17.9 and m* = 0.015*m_e. The binding energy formula provided is E=(13.6eV)*(m*/m_e)*(epsilon_0/epsilon)^2, but the user struggles to connect this to the Bohr radius equations. A suggested approach involves using the modified Bohr radius for the exciton, which incorporates the effective mass and dielectric constant. Clarification on notation differences in constants was also noted as a source of confusion. The thread concludes with a helpful exchange of formulas and insights on the topic.
Yroyathon
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
hi folks, almost done my semester of physics. this problem has my goat, can't quite figure it out. Done web searches endlessly, but most of the links are pdf articles that I can't access.

Homework Statement


A donor electron moves in doped semiconductor, for which ε/ε0 = 17.9 and m* = 0.015*m_e. Find the radius of a circular atomic orbit of such an electron in terms of the Bohr radius a_0 (Fig. 43-37). The effective nuclear charge for such a loosely bound electron is Z = 1.
ans= ____ a_0

Homework Equations


the binding energy E=(13.6eV)*(m*/m_e)*(epsilon_0/epsilon)^2

The Attempt at a Solution


(the figure is unimportant: a circle with a dot in it; I didn't include it)

so I've gotten the binding energy, which is pretty small. but I'm unsure how to connect this to the Bohr equations for radius. or, I'm not even sure if that's the right approach to take.

my question is, given this new binding/ionization energy, how can you find the radius?

Tips or suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks.

,Yroyathon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you can look up the bohr radius of an electron and proton...

a_0 = \frac{4\pi \epsilon_0 \hbar^2}{m_e e^2}

For the exciton you get...

a_{x0} = \frac{4\pi \epsilon\hbar^2}{m_{r}^* e^2} = \frac{\epsilon}{\epsilon_0}\cdot\frac{m_e}{m_r^*}\cdot a_0

Where 1/m_r^* = 1/m_e^* + 1/m_h^*.

P.S.: You might want to check my work.
 
thank you. that was exactly what I needed. I'd seen something similar to this in my web searches, but with the differences in constant notation (epsilon vs. epsilon_0 vs. kappa vs, etc.) I was pretty confused as to what was in the formula.

thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top