Doppler effect vs expansion effect on wavelength

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the contributions of the Doppler effect and cosmic expansion to the redshift of light from distant objects. For nearby objects within our galaxy, redshift is primarily due to their relative motion, while for intergalactic objects, the expansion of the universe becomes the dominant factor affecting redshift. The conversation references a paper arguing that the cosmological redshift can be interpreted as a series of Doppler shifts rather than solely as a result of space stretching. It emphasizes that both interpretations can coexist, depending on the chosen coordinate system. Understanding these effects is crucial for interpreting astronomical observations accurately.
rogerperkins
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Could you please clarify for me how much each of these contribute to the red shifting of light from distant objects? It seems to me that red shifting of light from near by objects i.e. within our galaxy would be affected more by the Doppler effect whereas for intergalactic objects the red shifting of light would be affected more by the expansion of the universe, eg. Light originating from some place billions of light years away and billions of years ago would get stretched out by the expansion of the universe and appear to be red shifted as if it were caused by the Doppler effect.

Thank You! :smile:

Roger
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are correct. The redshift from objects within our galaxy is solely due to their motion through space relative to us, as expansion does not affect bound objects like galaxies. Once you get a few hundred million lightyears away expansion starts to become the dominant form of redshift.
 
Here is a paper with some additional information:

“The kinematic origin of the cosmological redshiftâ€
By Emory F. Bunn and David W. Hogg

"A common belief about big-bang cosmology is that the cosmological redshift cannot be properly viewed as a Doppler shift (that is, as evidence for a recession velocity), but must be viewed in terms of the stretching of space. We argue that, contrary to this view, the most natural interpretation of the redshift is as a Doppler shift, or rather as the accumulation of many infinitesimal Doppler shifts. The stretching-of-space interpretation obscures a central idea of relativity, namely that it is always valid to choose a coordinate system that is locally Minkowskian. We show that an observed frequency shift in any spacetime can be interpreted either as a kinematic (Doppler) shift or a gravitational shift by imagining a suitable family of observers along the photon’s path. In the context of the expanding universe the kinematic interpretation corresponds to a family of comoving observers and hence is more natural."

http://arxiv.org/pdf/0808.1081.pdf
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Back
Top