Doppler shift above speed of sound.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the observed frequency of sound waves emitted by a source moving at 0.52 times the speed of sound, with an observer also moving at the same speed. For part (a), when the source and observer move toward each other, the observed frequency calculation is questioned due to a negative result, which is not physically meaningful. In part (b), the observed frequency when moving away from each other is calculated, but the accuracy of the results is uncertain. Participants clarify that the standard Doppler effect equation applies even at supersonic speeds, emphasizing the importance of using the correct formula for both scenarios. The conversation highlights the need for careful application of the Doppler effect principles in physics.
Cypripedium
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A source and an observer are each traveling at 0.52 times the speed of sound. The source emits sound waves at 1.2 kHz.

(a) Find the observed frequency (in kHz) if the source and observer are moving toward each other.

(b) Find the observed frequency (in Hz) if the source and observer are moving away from each other.


Homework Equations


frequency observed (fo) = (1 / (1 - (Vsource/Vsound))) * fsource

Change Vsource to negative if moving away from each other.


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm assuming we're going with 340 m/s for the speed of sound, but it shouldn't even matter because it'll always be a 1.04 ratio in the equation.

For part (a): Moving toward each other, so we can act like the observer is stationary and the source is moving at him at 1.04 times the speed of sound, 353.6 m/s. Plugging that into the equation and get -30 kHz. I don't know if that's actually incorrect, the negative just scares me.

For part (b): Moving away from each other, so we can act like the observer is stationary and the source is moving away from him at 1.04 times the speed of sound, 353.6 m/s. Plugging that into the equation gets me 588.24 Hz. I don't actually know if that is incorrect though.

Am I doing these correctly? I feel like the standard equation shouldn't really apply above the speed of sound, but what do I know, I'm just in an intro physics class! Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should not get a negative frequency. Without calculating, I believe you are close. The actual values of your answers make sense, the frequency should become much higher when they are moving towards each other (picture waves being 'scrunched' together) and the answer should be lower when they are moving away relative to each other (picture waves being 'stretched' out).
 
When both source and sound are moving, you should use this formula:

f’ = f(v+-vo)/(v+-vs), where v is the speed of sound. Choose + or - signs to suit the particular case.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top