Doppler Shift as Function of MUSIC

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the Doppler Shift equation for observed frequency in relation to time. The original equation presented is questioned for its lack of time representation, leading to confusion about how frequency changes as the source moves. It is clarified that the Doppler Shift remains constant over time if the source's speed and direction are unchanged, resulting in a horizontal graph of observed frequency. Additionally, a corrected equation for observed frequency is suggested, which includes the observer's velocity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the parameters affecting the Doppler Shift rather than time itself.
peterblair
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, the internet.

I am attempting to graph Doppler Shift as a function of time for a music project. The equation for observed frequency is:

fo=fs(c)/vs(c)

Where
fo is observed frequency
fs is the source frequency
c is the speed of sound
vs is the velocity of the source

But when working with this equation I became confused: The entire point of the Doppler Shift is that the frequency changes over time, but time seems to be represented nowhere in this equation. So, at what point in time, or alternatively how far away from the listener is this equation measuring?

Also, can someone provide me with an equation that could graph fo as a function of time?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Doppler shift doesn't change with time, it changes with a change in some of the parameters of the equation you have listed.

For example consider a speaker on a moving platform with a stationary observer. As long as the speaker's speed and direction of travel remain constant, the Doppler shift will be constant in time. In other words if you were to plot observed frequency as a function of time it would be a horizontal line crossing the y-axis at whatever observed frequency you measure.
 
You can graph it if you know v_s. That's where your time dependence is coming from: the moving source.
 
peterblair said:
Hello, the internet.

I am attempting to graph Doppler Shift as a function of time for a music project. The equation for observed frequency is:

fo=fs(c)/vs(c)

Where
fo is observed frequency
fs is the source frequency
c is the speed of sound
vs is the velocity of the source

But when working with this equation I became confused: The entire point of the Doppler Shift is that the frequency changes over time, but time seems to be represented nowhere in this equation. So, at what point in time, or alternatively how far away from the listener is this equation measuring?

Also, can someone provide me with an equation that could graph fo as a function of time?

Thanks!


That equation doesn't look right to me. It should be f_o=\frac{c+v_o}{c+v_s}f_s, where v_o is the velocity of the observer and the other variables are as defined by the OP.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top