Double Harmonic Approximation IR intensties

DinosaurChemi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This feels silly asking but I have a question about units using the double harmonic approximation to determine IR spectral intensities. In the double harmonic approximation the intensity is given by
the square of the derivative of the dipole with respect to a normal mode coordinate times a scaling constant. Numerically this can be done by taking let say a 0.01 step along a mass scaled coordinates. The standard units of dipole are debye and mass scaled coordinates are unit-less so total units of debye squared. The scaling factor is Avagadro's constant divided by the speed of light squared. This gets me in units of times2 current2. Intensities are reported in km/mol. If anyone can give me a little help here I would appreciate it

Again the equation is:

I=(\frac{\delta \mu}{\delta Q})^{2}\frac{\pi N_{A}}{3c^{2}}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where I is the intensity, \mu is the dipole moment, Q is the normal mode coordinate, N_{A} is Avogadro's constant, and c is the speed of light. To convert from debye squared to km/mol, you need to multiply your expression by 6.022x10^23 (Avogadro's constant) and then divide by 3x10^10 (the speed of light squared). This will give you the intensity in km/mol.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top