Double Integrals Advice - Please

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nima
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the volume generated by the area bounded by the curves y = x^3 and y = x^(1/3) with the function z = x^2y. Participants clarify the correct ranges for the variables, confirming that x should be between 0 and 1, and y should be between x^3 and x^(1/3). There is confusion regarding the lower boundary and the method of generating the volume, with emphasis on understanding the area in the x-y plane and how it relates to the function z. The final consensus is that the volume is formed by projecting the area in 3-D up to the function z(x, y). This discussion highlights the importance of accurately defining boundaries and understanding the volume of revolution concepts in double integrals.
Nima
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question and it asks me to evaluate the volume generated by the area bounded by y = x^3 and y = x^(1/3) and the function z = x^2.y

I'm just having a few problems with setting up the ranges of my variables x and y. I drew a sketch of the area in the x-y plane but I'm not sure what my ranges should be. My guess is: 0 <= x <= 1 and 0 <= y <= [x^(1/3) - x^3].

Help appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
As far as the xy-plane is concerned, yes, you can take 0< x< 1 and
x3< y< x1/3.

But I am concerned about the lower boundary. Apparently z= x2y is an upper boundary. What is the lower boundary?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
As far as the xy-plane is concerned, yes, you can take 0< x< 1 and
x3[/sub]< y< x1/3.

But I am concerned about the lower boundary. Apparently z= x2y is an upper boundary. What is the lower boundary?

Sorry, there seems to be confusion here, on my part at least.

1.) Your variable ranges are different to mine. Why is mine wrong, and why is yours right?

2.) What are you talking about, lower boundary? We have an area on the x-y plane and we revolve this to the function z = x^2.y to form a volume. Double Integral (x^2.y) dxdy using our variable ranges will evaluate this volume.
 
Look at your graph. for each point in the area, y is between the two curves: y is between x3 and x1/3. NOT between 0 and x1/3- x3.

You said in your first post that you wanted to find the volume of the region generated but didn't say HOW it was generated. I don't understand what you mean by "revolve this to the function z = x^2.y "

Is this a volume of revolution? If so, what axis are you revolving around?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Look at your graph. for each point in the area, y is between the two curves: y is between x3 and x1/3. NOT between 0 and x1/3- x3.

You said in your first post that you wanted to find the volume of the region generated but didn't say HOW it was generated. I don't understand what you mean by "revolve this to the function z = x^2.y "

Is this a volume of revolution? If so, what axis are you revolving around?
Thanks, I now understand why my range for y was wrong and yours is right. :)

Sorry, my unclear wording - You have an area in the x-y plane and the volume is generated as: area * height, where height = z(x, y). :. this area is projected in 3-D up to the function z(x, y) to form a volume under z(x, y) with the given x-y plane area as its base.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top