Programs Double major Physics and Petroleum Engineering

AI Thread Summary
Starting an Associates in Physics and Mechanical Engineering after obtaining a BS and MS in accounting reflects a passion for science and a strategic career move. The individual aims to enhance job prospects in the oil and gas sector while preparing for a future PhD in Physics. The discussion highlights the dilemma of pursuing a double degree versus focusing solely on engineering, with concerns about the demanding nature of both fields. While some argue that a physics degree may not directly lead to engineering jobs, others believe that a strong foundation in physics can be beneficial for graduate studies in engineering. The consensus leans towards obtaining the engineering degree while taking additional physics courses as electives, allowing for a more manageable workload and immediate job opportunities. The importance of reassessing the academic load as needed is also emphasized, especially given financial support for education. Overall, the conversation underscores the balance between passion for physics and practical career considerations in engineering.
hokte78
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm starting my Associates this summer in Physics and Mechanical Engineering. I have a BS and MS in accounting but science was always my first love so I'm starting all over again. I'm pursuing the double degree because I currently work as an accountant for an oil and gas company and the engineering degree will get me a better job while I continue on to the PhD in Physics. (I'll most likely be in my 40's before I could start the PhD) I've read several posts about choosing one major or the other for the undergrad. Would a straight physics degree get me into an engineering job? Or would I be able to go on to grad studies in physics with an engineering degree? I was told to just take extra physics classes while getting the engineering degree but if I'm able, why take the extra classes and not get the 2nd degree?

Any clarification would be greatly appreciated...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Engineering courses are very demanding themselves, why would you want to add the extra stress of getting a physics degree? Upper level physics courses are just as demanding. Yes there are some physicist that work as engineers but I doubt it's straight out of school. In order to go to grad school for engineering on just a straight physics degree you'll have to take some remedial engineering courses
 
I'm not going to grad school for engineering. I'd be going for Physics. Why get a physics degree? Why not? I love the field but I have to pay bills and starting all over with a degree in Physics at the age of 3? with no work expience in physics and no job prospects isn't very appealing. I have an engineering job waiting for me with my current firm once I get the engineering degree. Then I can continue with the graduate degree in physics.
 
My point is a double major in physics and engineering will be tough especially while trying to work. I'd take the engineering degree and some extra physics courses as electives. I'm actually doing that myself, my major is nuclear engineering but when I'm done ill have a physics minor and a math minor
 
That's a good point and I thank you for the reply. If the course work gets to a point where it's too much I'll reassess then. I've been lucky enough to have (most) of my school paid so I want to get as much out of it as I can.
 
hokte78 said:
That's a good point and I thank you for the reply. If the course work gets to a point where it's too much I'll reassess then. I've been lucky enough to have (most) of my school paid so I want to get as much out of it as I can.

I understand but I have heard of people going to grad school for physics with engineering degrees. Not sure if remedial courses were necessary, but a minor should about cover all the basics as will the double major.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top