Double-Quantity Reactions: CuO+CO & C+CO2

  • Thread starter Thread starter [Leo]
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of double-quantity reactions, specifically the reactions of CuO with CO producing Cu and CO2, followed by carbon reacting with CO2 to yield two moles of CO. The user highlights that these reactions result in a net increase in CO quantity, prompting a request for more examples of similar reactions. Participants express confusion over the term "growing reactions," with some stating that the described reactions seem typical rather than unique. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the need for further examples of reactions that increase product quantity beyond the initial reactants.
[Leo]
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If CO is released abowe heated Cu when gets CO2. When THAT CO2 is released abowe active C gets CO. When this experiment is done we have double quantity CO .
CuO + CO = Cu + CO2
C + CO2 = 2CO
Do you know more "growing" quantity reactions?
P.s. Sorry for my bad english
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hey... uumm,,, your english i somewhhat bbad... you speak what?? french, spanish,, post it anyway, there should be someone to translate it properly...
or maybe you can google for a free translator, you'll get them very easily...

what do you mean by growing reactions?
these two reactions just sound like normal reactions to me...

i've never heard about growing reactions
 
I wanted to say that quantity of CO has doubled during these two reactions and i need more examples like this...Then you have one material and after one or two or maybe three and more reactions you have more than you got at first.
 
Last edited:
oh yeah... uummm... i don;t kno... if i come across any, i'll let you know...
 

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

2CuO + C -> Something else than 2Cu + CO2
Replies
15
Views
4K
Find out the molar fractions of all the involved gases
Replies
5
Views
2K
Finding the Concentration of H3CO2 in a CO2+H2O reaction.
Replies
3
Views
8K
Calculate Mass of Carbon to Reduce Copper(II) Oxide
Replies
2
Views
10K
Equilibrium Calculation for Fe3O4-CO Reaction at 600°C and 5.00 atm
Replies
1
Views
2K
What Determines the Products of Heating (NH4)2CO3?
Replies
9
Views
32K
Synhelion -- Using solar heliostat farms to create liquid fuels from Water Vapor and CO2
Replies
7
Views
2K
Methane Combustion and Chemical Equilibrium
Replies
3
Views
9K
Optimizing Air Flow for CO2 and Heat Loss in Vans
Replies
7
Views
3K
Calculating CO2 Released in Propane BBQ Reaction
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top