Double slit diffraction maxima

AI Thread Summary
The distance between the two slits significantly affects the intensity of the diffraction maxima. When the slits are narrower than or equal to the wavelength of light, they act as point sources, creating a diffraction pattern on a distant screen with alternating light and dark fringes. The position of maxima and minima is determined by the path length difference between waves from the slits, with maxima occurring at path differences that are multiples of the wavelength. The relationship between path length difference and slit distance is expressed in the equation L1 - L2 = mλ, where m indicates the order of interference. Notably, the point directly opposite the slits will always be a maximum due to equal path lengths from both slits.
HorseBox
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
What effect does the distance between the two slits have on the intensity of the maxima?
 
Science news on Phys.org
It can have a large effect, if I understand what you mean by 'intensity'. What have you come up with so far?
 
I just started learning the concepts yesterday what I've got so far is that if I have a screen with 2 slits each of a width equal to or smaller than the wavelength of the light then the slits can be considered single point sources of waves. If I place another screen far away from the screen with the slits a diffraction pattern will form on it consisting of fringes of light (maxima) and dark strips (minima) in between them. If I'm not mistaken it can be determined whether any point on the screen is a maxima or minima by comparing the length L of the paths taken by a wave traveling from each of the slits. If there is a difference equal to any multiple of the wavelength of the light waves then it will be a maxima because it will be pure constructive interference and the opposite being true for path length differences of any multiple of the wavelength plus a half wavelength. The equation I got is
\frac{L_1 - L_2}{d} = sin\theta
I just read that this equation is the same as
\frac{L_1 - L_2}{d} = m\lambda
where m is determines the amount of destructive interference at the point on the screen. I can see now that since the wavelength remains constant altering the distance between the slits d will alter the value of m so will effect the amount of destructive interference between the two waves at any point.

EDIT: Then again point on the screen directly opposite the space between the 2 slits will always be a maximum because the waves from each slit always travel the same distance to reach it.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top