Double Slit Problem: Solving Unknown Wavelength

  • Thread starter Thread starter pari786
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Double slit Slit
pari786
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A double slit is illuminated simultaneously with orange light of wavelength 600nm and light of an unknown wavelength. the m=4 bright fringe of the unknown wavelength overlaps the m=3 bright orange fringe. What is the unknown wavelength?

Homework Equations



dsin(theta) = m(lambda)

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried finding d for orange light by suing the above formula. I substitued m=3
sin 90 and wavelength as 600 x 10^-9
and got d= 0.0000018m
and then I used this d to find unknown wavelength and used the same above equation but this time substitutes m=4 and sin120 and got wavelength= 0.000000389m or (389nm)

but my answer is wrong ... please tell me where I'm making mistake.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why did you use sin90 in the first case and sin 120 in the second? We don't know what angle the rays make with the axis.
Since its given that 3rd fringe of the orange light is equal to the 4th fringe of the unknown wavelenght, here the angle both rays (of different wavelengths) make with the axis is the same.
Therefore, here, dsin(theta) is a constant.
Thus, 3*600nm=4*x, giving the unknown wavelength to be 450nm.
 
chaoseverlasting said:
Why did you use sin90 in the first case and sin 120 in the second? We don't know what angle the rays make with the axis.
Since its given that 3rd fringe of the orange light is equal to the 4th fringe of the unknown wavelenght, here the angle both rays (of different wavelengths) make with the axis is the same.
Therefore, here, dsin(theta) is a constant.
Thus, 3*600nm=4*x, giving the unknown wavelength to be 450nm.

Yeah, I realized later on that angles are wrong ... I used
(delta)r = m(wavelength)
first I found the delta r quantity for orange light by substituting m=3 and wavelength = 600*10^-9m

and I got Delta r = 0.0000018 m and then I used the same equation but different value of m =4 (given in the question)
I got the same wavelength 450nm.

But thanks for the help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top