Undergrad Double slit with particles so heavy that they curve spacetime

  • Thread starter Thread starter greypilgrim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum gravity
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the implications of performing a double slit experiment with extremely heavy particles that curve spacetime, raising questions about the compatibility of quantum mechanics (QM) and general relativity (GR). It is noted that current theories like string theory and loop quantum gravity are not yet developed enough to provide definitive predictions for such scenarios. The conversation highlights that while classical theories may be nonlinear, their quantum counterparts often retain linear properties, as seen in quantum electrodynamics. A reference to a lecture suggests that observers within the experiment may perceive interference differently than outside observers, prompting inquiries about the acceptance of these conclusions in the scientific community. The dialogue concludes by questioning whether experiments like Wigner's friend significantly challenge the reconciliation of QM and GR.
greypilgrim
Messages
581
Reaction score
44
Hi.

I vaguely remember an article in a popular science magazine that tried to illustrate the problem of the reconcilability of QM and GR with the a double slit experiment with particles that are so heavy that they substantially curve spacetime, and since this is nonlinear, a quantum superposition description wouldn't work (I can't remember the exact conclusion though, and also can't find the article anymore).

Is that a valid point? What would string theory or loop quantum gravity predict?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
greypilgrim said:
I vaguely remember an article in a popular science magazine
Which would not be a good source for actual science.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
Moderator's note: Thread moved to the beyond the standard models forum.
 
greypilgrim said:
What would string theory or loop quantum gravity predict?
I don't think either of these is developed to the point where they make any definite prediction for such a scenario.
 
Electrodynamics (interaction of EM field with charged fields) is also nonlinear, but quantum electrodynamics is linear and the superposition principle is valid. The point is that electrodynamics, gravity, etc. are non-linear in the sense that Hamiltonian is a non-quadratic function of fields, but the corresponding quantum theory is linear in the sense that the equations are linear in the quantum state. For example, the Wheeler-DeWitt equation of quantum gravity is something like
$$H[\pi,g]|\psi\rangle =0 $$
which is linear in ##|\psi\rangle##, but ##H[\pi,g]## is a complicated (non-quadratic) function of metric fields ##g##.
 
  • Like
Likes PeterDonis and PeroK
Trying to find that article, I came across this lecture for the general audience:
https://scientifica.ch/event/vom-versuch-das-groesste-mit-dem-kleinsten-zu-vereinen/
It's in German, but the slides at 30:10 illustrate the point the professor is trying to make: If the double slit experiment is performed with structures that count as observers themselves, the "equations of quantum mechanics" predict that they will see interference, while an outside observer will not.
1714379712101.png


I'm not sure what "equations of quantum mechanics" he exactly means, but are those conclusions generally accepted? After all, the professor is co-author of the (in)famous Frauchiger-Renner paper which seems to be pretty controversial.

Also, are Wigner's friend experiments like this one really considered a major challenge in the reconcilability of QM and GR?
 
I thought I would start a thread, as as spinoff to perhaps highlight and contemplate of that the ideas in the paper mitchell porter pointed to means. I just started to sniff it.. and wrote in the other thread "How to fix Relativistic QM so it's consistent?" Indeed fixing relativity and how to understnad equivalences, seems to be the central issue of the below paper. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Huge paper, I havent ready it through fully but skimmed...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K