Double slit with particles so heavy that they curve spacetime

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter greypilgrim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of performing a double slit experiment with extremely heavy particles that could significantly curve spacetime, exploring the intersection of quantum mechanics (QM) and general relativity (GR). Participants consider theoretical predictions from string theory and loop quantum gravity, as well as the nature of nonlinearity in quantum electrodynamics compared to gravitational interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls an article discussing the challenges of reconciling QM and GR in the context of heavy particles affecting spacetime curvature, questioning the validity of this point.
  • Another participant suggests that popular science articles may not provide reliable scientific insights.
  • It is proposed that string theory and loop quantum gravity may not yet offer definitive predictions for scenarios involving heavy particles and spacetime curvature.
  • A participant notes that while electrodynamics is nonlinear, quantum electrodynamics remains linear, allowing for the superposition principle to hold, contrasting this with gravitational interactions.
  • A link to a lecture is shared, which discusses the implications of observers in the double slit experiment, raising questions about the acceptance of the conclusions presented by the professor, particularly in relation to the controversial Frauchiger-Renner paper.
  • There is a query about whether Wigner's friend experiments are viewed as significant challenges to the reconciliation of QM and GR.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reliability of popular science sources, the current state of theoretical predictions in string theory and loop quantum gravity, and the implications of observer effects in quantum mechanics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the acceptance of certain conclusions and the significance of Wigner's friend experiments.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of nonlinearity in gravitational theories compared to quantum theories, and the discussion includes references to specific theoretical frameworks without reaching consensus on their implications.

greypilgrim
Messages
581
Reaction score
44
Hi.

I vaguely remember an article in a popular science magazine that tried to illustrate the problem of the reconcilability of QM and GR with the a double slit experiment with particles that are so heavy that they substantially curve spacetime, and since this is nonlinear, a quantum superposition description wouldn't work (I can't remember the exact conclusion though, and also can't find the article anymore).

Is that a valid point? What would string theory or loop quantum gravity predict?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
greypilgrim said:
I vaguely remember an article in a popular science magazine
Which would not be a good source for actual science.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Moderator's note: Thread moved to the beyond the standard models forum.
 
greypilgrim said:
What would string theory or loop quantum gravity predict?
I don't think either of these is developed to the point where they make any definite prediction for such a scenario.
 
Electrodynamics (interaction of EM field with charged fields) is also nonlinear, but quantum electrodynamics is linear and the superposition principle is valid. The point is that electrodynamics, gravity, etc. are non-linear in the sense that Hamiltonian is a non-quadratic function of fields, but the corresponding quantum theory is linear in the sense that the equations are linear in the quantum state. For example, the Wheeler-DeWitt equation of quantum gravity is something like
$$H[\pi,g]|\psi\rangle =0 $$
which is linear in ##|\psi\rangle##, but ##H[\pi,g]## is a complicated (non-quadratic) function of metric fields ##g##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis and PeroK
Trying to find that article, I came across this lecture for the general audience:
https://scientifica.ch/event/vom-versuch-das-groesste-mit-dem-kleinsten-zu-vereinen/
It's in German, but the slides at 30:10 illustrate the point the professor is trying to make: If the double slit experiment is performed with structures that count as observers themselves, the "equations of quantum mechanics" predict that they will see interference, while an outside observer will not.
1714379712101.png


I'm not sure what "equations of quantum mechanics" he exactly means, but are those conclusions generally accepted? After all, the professor is co-author of the (in)famous Frauchiger-Renner paper which seems to be pretty controversial.

Also, are Wigner's friend experiments like this one really considered a major challenge in the reconcilability of QM and GR?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K