Maximum Deformation of Springs in a Collision: Deriving the Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter sumeer@dinsum.c
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
AI Thread Summary
A block of mass 20 kg is dropped 0.5 m onto two springs with stiffnesses of 500 N/m and 800 N/m, and the goal is to find the maximum deformation of each spring. The discussion emphasizes using the correct formula for equivalent spring stiffness when springs are in series, which is given by the reciprocal of the sum of their reciprocals. Participants clarify that the potential energy lost by the block is equal to the elastic energy stored in the springs during compression. The equations derived involve the total deformation of the springs and the forces acting on them during the collision. The conversation concludes with a successful resolution of the problem based on these principles.
sumeer@dinsum.c
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block of mass 20kg with a spring with a stiffness of 500N/m attached to the bottom is dropped .5m from rest onto another spring of stiffness 800N/m. The weight of the springs can be neglected. What is the maximum deformation of each spring due to the collision.

Homework Equations


work = change in kinetic energy + change in potential energy + change in elastic energy


The Attempt at a Solution


I have assumed that I can add the different spring coefficients, giving me an energy equation of:

work=0= -.5mv^2 + -mg(.5+x) + .5k(x^2)

here k is the sum of the spring coefficents and x is the total deformation of the spring.
I solved the equation, got two answers for x one positive and one negative.

Can I use the ratio of the spring coefficients to work out the individual reformation, and also do i use the positive value calculated for x?

Sorry for the long question, your help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ermm, if the springs are inline with each other (on top of each other) you add the reciprocals of the constants, so that:

{k_T}^{-1} = {k_1}^{-1} + {k_2}^{-1}

The system adds (becomes stiffer) when the springs are used adjacent to each other.

So I think, from the wording of the question, you need to use this equation maybe:

k_T = \frac{k_1 k_2}{k_1 + k_2} - Your thoughts

But yeah - the kinetic energy term would become mg\Delta h in your equation (because the kinetic energy came about from falling the distance \Delta h, cause when it hits the spring, your mgh = 0. Apart from that, logic seems fine...

Let me know how you get on :P
Sam
 
I do agree with Sam.. Keq = k.k'/(k + k') , is the one to be used.
Since, the two springs are adjacent, force in them must be equal => k.x = k'.x'
Equivalent spring, Keq.X = k.x = k'.x', where X = x + x'.

@ sumeer@dinsum.c
I posted this, just to urge one thing: please REASON OUT your assumptions! Do not make blind assumptions. The assumptions you made (that Keq = k+ k') would have been true, if elongations in both the springs would have been same! x = x', X = x = x', and Ftot = Keq.X = k.x + k'.x'
I hope you get the idea.
 
Hi Sam,

Thanks for your information, I've managed to work through the problem.
Sumeer
 
Last edited:
Hi Sameer, I don't how you solved the problem. But see whether it matches with this. Loss of PE of block = mg(0.5 +X). This energy is shared by the two springs and it is equal to 1/2*kx^2 + 1/2*k'x'^2. During the compression force in each spring is kx and k'x'. Hence down ward force =mg + kx and upward force = k'x'. In equilibrium position mg +kx = k'x' and X = x+x', write x' and X in terms of x and substitute it in the above energy equation. Then solve for x, and x'
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top