Doubling reaction recipe while maintaining concentration

AI Thread Summary
When scaling up a chemical reaction in a round bottom flask, simply doubling the volume of reactants and solvent while maintaining the same conditions may not yield the same product due to several factors. Concentrations of reactants are crucial, but other variables such as nucleation sites, solvent interactions with vessel walls, and air surface effects can significantly influence the outcome. Heat transfer becomes a critical issue in exothermic or endothermic reactions, complicating the scaling process. Stirring speed is particularly important; it can drastically affect yield, especially when moving from small to large scales. Experiences shared highlight that even minor changes, like equipment mishaps, can lead to inconsistent results. Additionally, optimizing reaction conditions for different batch sizes, as seen in silica gel manufacturing for HPLC columns, underscores the complexity of achieving reproducibility in scaled-up reactions.
Hyo X
Messages
101
Reaction score
11
Say we are running a chemical reaction of some kind, in liquid, in a round bottom flask.

We have a solvent, two reactants, a product, and the reaction is under stirring, reflux (volume maintained) and constant temperature.

In my mind, if we simply double the volume of all the reactants and the solvent, and maintain the same reaction conditions, really it is only the concentrations of the reactants that matter. So ideally the product should be the same.

Is this true? What other variables would make a double-batch reaction different than a standard batch? Why or how?

Do nucleation sites, or interaction of the solvent with the vessel walls or air surface matter? I can be more specific about our reaction if necessary. Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Scaling is not always that easy. Especially when the reaction is exo- or endothermic heat transfer can become a problem.
 
As Borek mentioned, scaling isn't easy. It's why chemical engineers are needed when pharmaceuticals need to be made on the hundreds of kg scale. Even things like stirring speed can drastically affect your % yield on a different scale. Stirring can become tricky when you are working with kilos worth of material. I'll never forget the time our process chemist was scaling up a reaction I did on the multiple kg scale and dropped her glove inside the reaction vessel. The reaction worked beautifully. After that though she could never get it to repeat again.


I used to also manufacture the silica gel packings that go into hplc columns and size of scale was critically important. It took the companies years to optimize the reaction conditions between different size batches of silica in order to make reproducible lots of hplc columns. A reaction with 50g starting material had a different stirring speed and reaction time as a 500 g reaction.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top