Doubt in Partial derivative of complex variables

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the Laplacian in complex analysis, specifically the equation \(\triangle=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}\). The user seeks clarification on how to express derivatives with respect to \(z\) and \(\bar{z}\) using the chain rule. They reference Wirtinger derivatives, defined as \(\frac{\partial}{\partial z}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x} -i \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \right)\) and \(\frac{\partial}{\partial\overline{z}}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x} +i \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \right)\). The user concludes that multiplying these differential operators yields \(\frac{1}{4}\) of the Laplacian.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex variables and functions
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and the chain rule
  • Knowledge of Wirtinger derivatives
  • Basic concepts of Laplacian operators in multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Wirtinger derivatives in complex analysis
  • Explore the derivation of the Laplacian in polar coordinates
  • Learn about the properties of mixed partial derivatives
  • Investigate the role of the Laplacian in solving partial differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as educators teaching advanced calculus concepts.

smart_worker
Messages
131
Reaction score
1
Today, I had a class on Complex analysis and my professor wrote this on the board :

The Laplacian satisfies this equation :

lap.JPG

where,

pla.JPG

So, how did he arrive at that equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
## \triangle=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}##. Now you should just use chain rule to write derivatives w.r.t. x and y, in terms of derivative w.r.t. ## z ## and ## \bar z ##.
 
Shyan said:
## \triangle=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}##. Now you should just use chain rule to write derivatives w.r.t. x and y, in terms of derivative w.r.t. ## z ## and ## \bar z ##.

x = (z + z¯)/2
and
y = (z - z¯)/2i

How do I solve this further?

EDIT:Sorry, I don't know how to write the latex code to represent the "Bar" above "z"
 
I guess, I'll have to use Wirtinger derivatives.
 
By the definition $$\frac{\partial}{\partial z}=\frac12\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x} -i \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \right), \qquad \frac{\partial}{\partial\overline z}=\frac12\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x} +i \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \right).$$ So if you multiply these two differential operators and use the fact that $$\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}$$ (equality of mixed partial derivatives), you get exactly the Laplacian.
 
I meant ##1/4## of the Laplacian, i.e. $$\frac14\left(\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} \right).$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K