I Doubt in the quantum harmonic oscillator

Lebnm
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
I was reviewing the harmonic oscillator with Sakurai. Using the annihilation and the creation operators ##a## and ##a^{\dagger}##, and the number operator ##N = a^{\dagger}a##, with ##N |n \rangle = n | n \rangle##, he showed that ##a | n \rangle## is an eigenstate of ##N## with eigenvalue ##n - 1##, so he concludes that ##a | n \rangle \propto | n - 1 \rangle##. But, to it be true, the spectrum of ##N## should be non-degenerated, shouldn't it? Is this true? Can I proof this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You already label the eigen values by their energy, which relies on that the eigenvalues are non-degenerate.
 
  • Like
Likes Lebnm
So, in the definition of the eigenstates of ##N##, I am imposing that they are non-degenerated, right? Is there some physical reason to do this? I can't see why the spectrum of ##N##, and consequently the spectrum of the hamiltonian, need to be non-degenerated in a harmonic oscillator.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Lebnm said:
I can't see why the spectrum of ##N##, and consequently the spectrum of the hamiltonian, need to be non-degenerated in a harmonic oscillator.
You'll have to look in an introductory textbook, such as Griffiths.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top