Drag force on cylinder in parallel flow

AI Thread Summary
A correlation for the drag force on a cylinder in parallel creeping flow is sought, with the user noting that their length-to-width ratio allows for the assumption of an infinitely long cylinder. The discussion highlights the challenge posed by Stokes' paradox, which is relevant for flow perpendicular to the cylinder but also affects parallel flow due to the influence of inertial forces at larger distances. Solutions from Batchelor and Keller using slender-body theory are mentioned as useful, with the latter providing results applicable to finite cylinders. Lamb's hydrodynamics solution is recognized as not being exact, as it also incorporates a linear inertia term in the Navier-Stokes equations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a straightforward equation for calculations without delving deeply into complex derivations.
MichielM
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm looking for a correlation of the drag force on a cylinder in parallel creeping (stokes') flow (i.e. the flow is alongside the axis of the cylinder). My length-to-width ratio is such that assuming an infinitely long cylinder is perfectly okay.

Does anyone know where I can find such a correlation?

I've tried deriving it myself but I ran into something called the Stokes' paradox. I know this can be solved by an approximation method (taking a linear inertia term into account), but I do not want to dive in that deep, I just need the equation for a calculation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've found useful equations from Batchelor (1970) and Keller (1976) who use 'slender-body theory' in which the rod is approximated as a line of stokeslets (singular force terms)
 
Are you asking if the flow is parallel to or or perpendicular to the axis of the cylinder?

Stokes' paradox is, IIRC, for flow perpendicular to the axis of the cylinder. There's an exact solution in Lamb's 'hydrodynamics', which is at work. It involves the Euler constant (0.577...).
 
Stokes' paradox was first found for a cylinder perpendicular to the flow, but the same effect (and for the same reason) is present for flow parallel to the cylinder. The basic problem is not the direction of flow but rather the fact the effect of inertial as compared to viscous forces are no longer negligible at large distances from the body.

As for the flow solution: slender body theory provides results for both parallel and perpendicular flow for finite cylinders. Lamb's solution is for an infinite cylinder. Although I said that would be perfectly fine given my length to width ratio, the results for slender body theory apply to finite cylinders which is more useful to me. Moreover, lamb's solution is not exact either, it also involves assuming a linear inertia term in the navier stokes equation
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
20K
Replies
45
Views
5K
Back
Top