Drag force on cylinder in parallel flow

AI Thread Summary
A correlation for the drag force on a cylinder in parallel creeping flow is sought, with the user noting that their length-to-width ratio allows for the assumption of an infinitely long cylinder. The discussion highlights the challenge posed by Stokes' paradox, which is relevant for flow perpendicular to the cylinder but also affects parallel flow due to the influence of inertial forces at larger distances. Solutions from Batchelor and Keller using slender-body theory are mentioned as useful, with the latter providing results applicable to finite cylinders. Lamb's hydrodynamics solution is recognized as not being exact, as it also incorporates a linear inertia term in the Navier-Stokes equations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a straightforward equation for calculations without delving deeply into complex derivations.
MichielM
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm looking for a correlation of the drag force on a cylinder in parallel creeping (stokes') flow (i.e. the flow is alongside the axis of the cylinder). My length-to-width ratio is such that assuming an infinitely long cylinder is perfectly okay.

Does anyone know where I can find such a correlation?

I've tried deriving it myself but I ran into something called the Stokes' paradox. I know this can be solved by an approximation method (taking a linear inertia term into account), but I do not want to dive in that deep, I just need the equation for a calculation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've found useful equations from Batchelor (1970) and Keller (1976) who use 'slender-body theory' in which the rod is approximated as a line of stokeslets (singular force terms)
 
Are you asking if the flow is parallel to or or perpendicular to the axis of the cylinder?

Stokes' paradox is, IIRC, for flow perpendicular to the axis of the cylinder. There's an exact solution in Lamb's 'hydrodynamics', which is at work. It involves the Euler constant (0.577...).
 
Stokes' paradox was first found for a cylinder perpendicular to the flow, but the same effect (and for the same reason) is present for flow parallel to the cylinder. The basic problem is not the direction of flow but rather the fact the effect of inertial as compared to viscous forces are no longer negligible at large distances from the body.

As for the flow solution: slender body theory provides results for both parallel and perpendicular flow for finite cylinders. Lamb's solution is for an infinite cylinder. Although I said that would be perfectly fine given my length to width ratio, the results for slender body theory apply to finite cylinders which is more useful to me. Moreover, lamb's solution is not exact either, it also involves assuming a linear inertia term in the navier stokes equation
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
20K
Replies
45
Views
5K
Back
Top