Drag forces on someone diving into a pool

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the time it takes for a diver, entering a pool at 7.0 m/s, to slow down to 2% of that speed under the influence of a drag force defined as FD = (-1.00×10^4 kg/s)v. The diver's mass is 75 kg, and the forces acting on them are analyzed using the equation ΣF = mg - FD = may. The challenge arises from the fact that the drag force is velocity-dependent, complicating the use of kinematic equations that assume constant acceleration. One participant expresses confusion over the large acceleration value obtained when using the drag force formula, prompting a re-evaluation of the drag coefficient's validity. The discussion emphasizes the need to correctly account for variable forces in motion equations.
Serik
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You dive straight down into a pool of water. You hit the water with a speed of 7.0 m/s, and your mass is 75 kg.

Assuming a drag force of the form FD= (−1.00×104 kg/s)v, how long does it take you to reach 2% of your original speed? (Ignore any effects of buoyancy.)

Homework Equations



\SigmaF=ma
V=Vo+at (?)

The Attempt at a Solution



I summed the forces in the y-direction (down is positive):
\SigmaF=mg-FD=may

2% of 7 m/s = 0.14 m/s

But I don't know what to do from here. How do I solve for ay when the drag force varies with velocity? If ay varies, then how can I use the kinematic equations for constant a?

I figured this out the hard way after plugging in 7.0 m/s for v and solving for a, which is an absurdly large number. (-923 m/s2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure that FD=(-1.00x104)v?
This coefficient seems kind of large to be for drag, recheck the numbers.
 
Last edited:
Lazyshot,

I should've placed the negative sign outside the parenthesis, but yes, according to my book and MasteringPhysics, that is the coefficient.

FD=-(1.00x104)v
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top