Dynamics 1: Motion Along a Line

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving an object sliding down a slope with friction. Participants are tasked with deriving an expression for the object's speed at the bottom of the slope, considering variables such as mass, height, length, and the coefficient of kinetic friction. The focus is on the application of concepts from dynamics, energy conservation, and trigonometry.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Initial posts express a lack of understanding of how to approach the problem, with participants unsure about the relevant physics concepts.
  • Some participants propose using energy conservation principles, stating that the final kinetic energy equals the initial potential energy minus the work done by friction.
  • There are multiple formulations of the speed expression, with variations in how to handle the trigonometric functions involved.
  • One participant suggests simplifying the expression by eliminating trigonometric functions, indicating a potential path forward.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about how to express the answer in terms of height and length without trigonometric functions.
  • Participants discuss the relationship between sine and cosine functions, hinting at using Pythagorean identities to simplify the expression.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the final expression for the speed or the best method to simplify it. There are competing views on how to handle the trigonometric components and whether the coefficient of kinetic friction should influence the final answer.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the need to clarify assumptions regarding the relationships between the variables involved, particularly in terms of trigonometric identities and their application in this context.

Rob123456789
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
<< Mentor Note -- poster has been reminded to fill out the Attempt at the Solution part of the Template in future HH threads >>[/color]

1. Homework Statement

An object of mass m is at rest at the top of a smooth slope of height h and length L. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the object and the surface, μk, is small enough that the object will slide down the slope if given a very small push to get it started.

Find an expression for the object's speed at the bottom of the slope.

Express your answer in terms of the variables m, μk, L, h, and appropriate constants.

No clue how to do this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Rob123456789 said:

Homework Statement


An object of mass m is at rest at the top of a smooth slope of height h and length L. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the object and the surface, μk, is small enough that the object will slide down the slope if given a very small push to get it started.

Find an expression for the object's speed at the bottom of the slope.

Express your answer in terms of the variables m, μk, L, h, and appropriate constants.

No clue how to do this.

Unfortunately, you need to have some idea how to tackle the problem and show us how far you can get on your own before you get stuck. What do you know about motion, acceleration, gravity, kinetic energy etc.?
 
This is what I get :
final KE = initial PE - work done
½mv² = mgh - µk*mgLcos(arcsin(h/L)) → multiply by 2/m
v² = 2gh - 2µk*mgLcos(arcsin(h/L)) → take square root

v = √(2gh - 2µk*gLcos(arcsin(h/L))
 
Rob123456789 said:
This is what I get :
final KE = initial PE - work done
½mv² = mgh - µk*mgLcos(arcsin(h/L)) → multiply by 2/m
v² = 2gh - 2µk*mgLcos(arcsin(h/L)) → take square root

v = √(2gh - 2µk*gLcos(arcsin(h/L))

You may want to do something about ##\cos(\arcsin(h/L))## but otherwise that looks right.
 
What do I do with it ?
 
Rob123456789 said:
What do I do with it ?

You could get rid of the trig functions.
 
v = √(2gh - 2µk*gLcos(h/L)) ?
 
or v = √(2gh - 2µk*gL(h/L))?
 
Rob123456789 said:
or v = √(2gh - 2µk*gL(h/L))?

That makes no sense.
 
  • #10
Still gives me : The correct answer does not depend on: μκ.
 
  • #11
Rob123456789 said:
What do I do with it ?

##\cos## and ##\sin## are related, which allows you to express the answer in terms of ##h## and ##L## without any trig functions. You don't have to do this.
 
  • #12
Don't really understand what you mean by expressing it in terms of h and L. This is the part I am stuck on.
 
  • #13
Rob123456789 said:
Don't really understand what you mean by expressing it in terms of h and L. This is the part I am stuck on.

You can either use ##\cos^2 + \sin^2 = 1## or go back to your diagram and express ##\cos## in terms of ##h## and ##L## using Pythagoras.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K