Dynamics- effect caused be angle, friction

AI Thread Summary
Friction opposes the sliding motion of a mass, resulting in decreased acceleration. When considering oscillations, friction also reduces both amplitude and frequency. Additionally, if the system has initial movement against friction, it can increase negative acceleration and potentially stop the system entirely. A formula for angular motion can help demonstrate how friction slows acceleration. Overall, friction significantly impacts both linear and oscillatory dynamics.
PRITEC
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

With reference to the attached diagram 1, what affect will friction have on the acceleration?

Below is my solution, but is there something that I can include? and is it explained correctly?:

"Since friction acts as a force which opposes in this case the sliding motion of the mass M, therefore this will cause a decrease in the acceleration of the mass. "

And with reference to diagram 2, what affect will friction have on the oscillations?
 

Attachments

  • 161220121404.jpg
    161220121404.jpg
    22.5 KB · Views: 389
Physics news on Phys.org
PRITEC said:
"Since friction acts as a force which opposes in this case the sliding motion of the mass M, therefore this will cause a decrease in the acceleration of the mass. "
To be strictly accurate, there is another possibility. If the system is given some initial movement which is counter to the (frictionless) acceleration, for as long as the movement is in that direction, friction will increase the magnitude of the (negative) acceleration.
The only other thing you might say is that it could stop the system entirely.
And with reference to diagram 2, what affect will friction have on the oscillations?
What affects do you think it will have on amplitude and frequency?
 
Hi,

Thanks for the reply. Is there a formula (angular) which I can use to prove that friction slows acceleration?

What affects do you think it will have on amplitude and frequency?

I think the amplitude and frequency will decrease.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top