Dynamics. Inclined plane with friction coefficient

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics exercise involving an inclined plane with friction, where the time taken to ascend is twice that of descending. The calculations presented initially led to the conclusion that a friction coefficient does not exist under the given conditions. However, participants identified that the problem statement was likely incorrect, suggesting it should state that the descent time is double the ascent time. Additionally, there were mentions of algebraic errors in the calculations, although these were thought to cancel out in the final analysis. Ultimately, the confusion stemmed from the wording of the problem, which was clarified by the contributors.
Pepealej
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I've got the following exercise, which I've done 3 times already and I think I haven't made any mistake:
A body is slid upwards through an inclined plane of angle \theta=15\degree. Determine the friction coefficient of the body with the surface of the plane if the time it takes to go upwards t_a is double the time it takes to go downwards t_b (t_a=2t_b).

Mi procedure is as follows:

The normal force: N=mg\cos(\theta).

1. Upwards:

During the ascent the x componen of the weight and the friction force act in the same direction, therefore: a_a=-g\sin(\theta)-\mu g\cos(\theta)=-g(\sin(\theta)+\mu\cos(\theta)).

The ecuacion of space as a function of time is: x=2v_0 t_b -2g(\sin(\theta)+\mu\cos(\theta))t_b^2 (1).
The ecuation of speed as a function of time is: 0=v_0 -2g(\sin(\theta)+\mu\cos(\theta))t_b (2).

2. Downwards

During the descent the x component of the weight and the friction force act in opposite directions, therefore: a_a=-g\sin(\theta)+\mu g\cos(\theta)=-g(\sin(\theta)-\mu\cos(\theta)).

The ecuation of space as a function of time is: 0=x-\frac{1}{2}g(\sin(\theta)-\mu\cos(\theta))t_b^2 (3).Combining (1), (2) and (3) we obtain:

\frac{1}{2}g(\sin(\theta)-\mu\cos(\theta))t_b^2=4g(\sin(\theta)+\mu\cos(\theta))t_b^2-2g(\sin(\theta)+\mu\cos(\theta))t_b^2
\sin(\theta)-\mu\cos(\theta)=4\sin(\theta)+4\mu\cos(\theta)
\mu=-\frac{3}{5}\tan(\theta)

From here I deduce that a value for \mu, for with the conditions are met, doesn't exist. Is it correct?

Thanks! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From the calculation, I deduce that the object is given an initial push up the plane, then left to the mercies of gravity and friction. That was not clear from the description.
If so, it seems obvious to me that the descent will last longer than the ascent. So maybe the problem description is wrong and it should be tb = 2ta.
 
haruspex said:
From the calculation, I deduce that the object is given an initial push up the plane, then left to the mercies of gravity and friction. That was not clear from the description.
If so, it seems obvious to me that the descent will last longer than the ascent. So maybe the problem description is wrong and it should be tb = 2ta.

Adding to that, the relation between ascent time and descent time depends on the push velocity given to the object, which is not specified. Is that the complete problem statement?

Also, there are several algebraic errors in the solution.
 
haruspex said:
From the calculation, I deduce that the object is given an initial push up the plane, then left to the mercies of gravity and friction. That was not clear from the description.
If so, it seems obvious to me that the descent will last longer than the ascent. So maybe the problem description is wrong and it should be tb = 2ta.

Oh my.. That might be the mistake.. U_U Didn't notice that (the exercise is wirtten wrongly) Thanks. I'll see if that was the problem.
 
Sourabh N said:
Adding to that, the relation between ascent time and descent time depends on the push velocity given to the object, which is not specified.
No, that doesn't affect the ratio.
Also, there are several algebraic errors in the solution.
Yes, but I suspect these were in transcribing it for the post. They all seem to cancel out later.
 
Thanks for your replies. The problem was the question was wrongly written (tb=2ta, not ta=2tb). That was it :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top