Dynamics & Kinematics Assignment Question. Am I on the right track?

Mohammed17
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. At a time when mining asteroids has become feasible, astronauts have connected a line between their 3500-kg space tug and a 6200-kg asteroid. Using their tug's engine, they pull on the asteroid with a force of 490 N. Initially the tug and the asteroid are at rest, 450 m apart. How much time does it take for the tug and the asteroid to meet?

G:

Ok so I know that the 3500 kg space tug (exerting 490 N on the asteroid) will also feel a force exerted on it by the 6200 kg asteroid (Newton's third law) of -490 N (or a pull of 490 N on the itself by the asteroid).
I also know that the distance is 450 meters between the asteroid and the space-tug. This will help me later on in the kinematic portion.

I know that Vo (Initial Velocity) is 0 for both. I also know that they both will experience a velocity towards each other once they start to tug on the asteroid.


I don't know whether to use Sigma Fx = m*a
and go from there... I tried that but in the end I have two variables: aST and aAsteroid
or should I just say that 490 N = Mass of ST*acceleration of ST
ad 490 N = Mass of Asteroid*acceleration of Asteroid

So you get:

490 N / 3500 kg = 0.14 m/s^2 = Acceleration of spacetug
and
490 N / 6200 kg = 0.079 m/s^2 = Acceleration of Asteroid\


Then where do I go from there?

Do I plug it into:


d = Vot + 1/2at^2 I know Vo = 0
450 m = 0 + 1/2at^2
450 m = 1/2(Acceleration of Space Tug + Acceleration of Asteroid)^2
SquareRoot of [(2 x 450 m)/(0.14 + 0.079)] = t

I got t = 64.106 seconds

THerefore, they will meet each other after 64.11 seconds. Is that correct?





Please help. Thank you.

- Mohammed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think you're right. I would apply the same method.
 
Ambidext said:
Think you're right. I would apply the same method.

thanks.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top