Dynamics of Uniform Circular Motion Quesiotn

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the true weight of a satellite with a mass of 5700 kg when at rest on a planet's surface. The satellite orbits at a height of 4.2 x 10^5 m with a period of two hours, and the radius of the planet is 4.25 x 10^6 m. Participants clarify that while the mass remains constant at 5700 kg, weight, measured in Newtons, varies due to gravitational attraction. To find the weight, one must first calculate the planet's mass using the satellite's orbital parameters and then apply the gravitational force formula at the planet's surface. The key takeaway is the distinction between mass and weight, emphasizing that weight is dependent on gravitational force.
kraigballa
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A satellite has a mass of 5700 kg and is in a circular orbit 4.2 multiplied by 10^5 m above the surface of a planet. The period of the orbit is two hours. The radius of the planet is 4.25 multiplied by 10^6 m. What is the true weight of the satellite when it is at rest on the planet's surface?

Homework Equations



G = gravitational constant
Me = Mass of planet
r1 = radius from planet to satellite
r2 = radius of planet
v = velocity of satellite in orbit
Fc = centripetal force
T = Time

Fc = msat*v^2/r


G*msat*Me/r^2 = msat*v^2/r

v = Sq. Root(G*Me/r)

The Attempt at a Solution



r1 = 4.67e^6
r2 = 4.25e^6

T = 7200seconds

so v1 = 2*pie*r1/T = 4075.343803 m/s

so Me = v^2 * r1/G = 1.1628389e^24

not sure how to find mass of satellite on planet from here...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mass of the satellite on the planet is the same as everywhere else, 5700 kg. That's only part of your problem. When you say

G*msat*Me/r^2 = msat*v^2/r

what did you use for r? It'd better be r1+r2, the distance from the center of the planet not the surface.
 
Yeah for r1 I did the radius of the planet plus the radius of the satellite.

So it should be 5700 kg up in orbit and still 5700 kg on the planets surface? Edit: I guess the answer is supposed to be in "N"
 
kraigballa said:
Yeah for r1 I did the radius of the planet plus the radius of the satellite.

So it should be 5700 kg up in orbit and still 5700 kg on the planets surface? Edit: I guess the answer is supposed to be in "N"

Don't confuse mass with weight. Mass is the same everywhere, but "weight" is the force with which the planet attracts the satellite near its surface. Mass is expressed in kilograms and weight in Newtons. Do you know how to find the weight?
 
I am not sure how to find weight...? With the given problem that is
 
You can find the mass of the planet when the satellite is in orbit from the given quantities. Then put the satellite at rest on the surface of the planet and find the gravitational attraction at that point. That is the weight.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top