Dynamics Question-Parabolic Coordinates

QuantumLuck
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am told that parabolic coordinates in a plane are defined by \xi = r + x and \eta = r - x. after this i am then asked to show that this leads to a given expresion for the kinetic energy (if i knew x and y i could find this without a problem). From this I am then told to find the equations of motion, an expression which i find very vague. I am in fact familiar with the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms (loosely) but I do not know what my expression for potential energy will be in this system (if i am on the right track here). Anyway, the main problem I am having at the moment is that I am very unsure as to what "r" is. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a two-dimensional problem (i.e. what system are you looking at)? If so, then my guess is that r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}. From this, you could invert the equations and then recast your Lagrangian (or Hamiltonian) in these two new coordinates (since you should know what L=T-V looks like in Cartesian coordinates already). Maybe an obvious expansion will present itself when you see it in these new variables.
 
cipher42 said:
Is this a two-dimensional problem (i.e. what system are you looking at)? If so, then my guess is that \sqrt{x^2+y^2}. From this, you could invert the equations and then recast your Lagrangian (or Hamiltonian) in these two new coordinates (since you should know what L=T-V looks like in Cartesian coordinates already). Maybe an obvious expansion will present itself when you see it in these new variables.

so yeah i think this is right. so here is what i did; \xi = \sqrt{x^2+y^2}+x and then i squared both sides to obtain \xi^{2} = 2x^{2} + y^{2} + 2x \sqrt{x^2+y^2} and \eta^{2} = 2x^{2} + y^{2} -2x \sqrt{x^2+y^2} so now that i have these equations i have been playing around with them trying to look for a way to separate out the x and the y terms so i can get x and y in terms of \xi and \eta. the various i have tried to do this is to add and subtract these equations to each other, each resulting in a varying degree of failure. not sure where to go from here, if i have even went about this correctly.
 
QuantumLuck said:
so yeah i think this is right. so here is what i did; \xi = \sqrt{x^2+y^2}+x and then i squared both sides to obtain \xi^{2} = 2x^{2} + y^{2} + 2x \sqrt{x^2+y^2} and \eta^{2} = 2x^{2} + y^{2} -2x \sqrt{x^2+y^2} so now that i have these equations i have been playing around with them trying to look for a way to separate out the x and the y terms so i can get x and y in terms of \xi and \eta. the various i have tried to do this is to add and subtract these equations to each other, each resulting in a varying degree of failure. not sure where to go from here, if i have even went about this correctly.

oops I am dumb. clearly to find x i take \xi - \eta to find that \xi - \eta \ = 2x and as such \ x = (1/2)\xi - \eta so i then plug in x and find that \ y =\sqrt{\xi\eta} at which point i then showed that kinetic energy \ T=(m/8)(\xi+\eta)(\dot{\xi}^2/\xi +\dot{\eta}^2/\eta). the final thing that i now have to do for this problem is to write down the equations of motion. now since this is for a particle am i assuming that the potential energy is varying solely as a gravitational potential? it is not obvious to me at all. or rather should i go through the action integral formalism for this coordinate system?
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top