Dynamics - sled up a hill with several angles?

AI Thread Summary
A boy is dragging a 90.0N sled up an 18-degree hill with a 40.0N force at a 35-degree angle. The challenge is to determine the coefficient of kinetic friction between the sled and the snow. The normal force can be calculated, but confusion arises regarding the kinetic friction and its relation to the forces acting on the sled. It is clarified that the x-component of the pulling force does not equal the friction force due to the gravitational component also acting in the x-direction. Understanding that zero net force indicates no acceleration, rather than no movement, is crucial for solving the problem.
optoracko
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A boy drags his sled of 90.0N at a constant speed up a 18 degree hill. He pulls with a 40.0N force on a rope which is 35 degrees above the horizontal.

a) What is coefficient of kinetic friction between the sled and the snow?

Homework Equations



Coefficieint = Force of Kinetic Friction / Normal Force

The Attempt at a Solution



I can find the normal force, no problem. It's just the kinetic friction I'm having trouble finding. I would think that the kinetic friction would be whatever the x component of the force applied is, since that is what is opposing the sled. However, if that was true, the Force net of the x prime would be 0. How would this be the kinetic friction then? Wouldn't it be for static since there is no movement?

I thought of doing this and checked yahoo answers, a response had a similar method. I just don't understand why to do this though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand. What is your coordinate system? Is the x-direction parallel to the slope, or parallel to the horizontal? What is x prime?
 
JaWiB said:
I'm not sure I understand. What is your coordinate system? Is the x-direction parallel to the slope, or parallel to the horizontal? What is x prime?
The x direction is parallel to the slope. X basically the x direction (the slope, back and forth). Don't know why I said prime now, lol.
 
Ok, well first of all the x-component of the pulling force isn't equal to the friction force because gravity also has a component in the x-direction. Second, zero net force means zero acceleration, not necessarily no movement.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top