E-field of non-conducting, nonuniform shell

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pixter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E-field Shell
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field (E-field) of a non-conducting, non-uniform spherical shell with a volume charge distribution given by P = (G/r^2). The E-field is determined for three regions: inside the shell (rb). The conclusions state that E=0 for rb, where Q is the total charge in the shell. The E-field is continuous at the boundaries r=a and r=b.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law and its application in electrostatics.
  • Familiarity with volume charge density and integration techniques.
  • Knowledge of electric field concepts in spherical coordinates.
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations and understanding relationships.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law in different charge distributions.
  • Learn about electric fields in non-uniform charge distributions.
  • Explore the concept of charge continuity and its implications in electrostatics.
  • Investigate graphical representation of electric fields and their relationships with distance.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding electric fields in non-uniform charge distributions.

Pixter
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Right have a shell that has a volym charge distribution P=(G/r^2) and with inner radius a and outer radius b.

Now what is the e-field at r<a, a<r<b, r>b


Homework Equations



gauss's law: surfaceint[E.da]=Qenclosed/epsilon0
Qenc=volymint[PdV)



The Attempt at a Solution



Right this is what i tried.

for r<a: there is no enclosed charge so E is zero at all points.

for a<r<b:

well first E is radially outwards and normal to the surface so the gauss integral just go to
E4[pi]r^2

Qenclosed=volymint[PdV] between r and a

goes to -> volymint[(G/r^2)(4[pi]r^2)dr] -> 4[pi]G*volymint[dr] evulated at r and a

-> 4[pi]G(r-a)

and E4[pi]r^2=(4[pi]G(r-a))/epsilon0
which then goes to -> E=(G(r-a))/(epsilon0*r^2)

then for r>b:

it's the same calc as for a<r<b but we end up with E=(G(b-a))/(epsilon0*r^2)


now I'm wondering have I done something wrong and if I had to plot it on a graph where we have E/r then for the first part upto a E would be zero and for the part where r>b it would follow a 1/r^2 relation, but how do i figure out the realation for part a<r<b, my algebra seems to suck a bit.. =)

but yeah.. does this look correct?
and if so, can you help me or give me a hint hwo to work out the relation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am having some difficulty reading your equation, so I would not comment on them...

For r<a, E=0..
For a<r<b, E grows linearly..
For b<r, E = Q/r^2 whereas Q = the total charge in the shell..
E is continuous at r = a and r = b..

If your solution satisfy the conditions above, your solution should be correct...
 
chanvincent said:
I am having some difficulty reading your equation, so I would not comment on them...

For r<a, E=0..
For a<r<b, E grows linearly..
For b<r, E = Q/r^2 whereas Q = the total charge in the shell..
E is continuous at r = a and r = b..

If your solution satisfy the conditions above, your solution should be correct...

pretty sure you are wrong.. outside the spherical shell E will be proportinal to 1/r^2 as for any other spherical charge..

but inside the shell it will be proportinal to (1/r)-(1/r^2) following my equations, because the shell doesn't have uniform charge..

also note the shell is non-conducting..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K