E-field Perturbation of 2D rotor. Show Y_10 couples ground state?

fandango92
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a molecule with an electric dipole moment d. The Hamiltonian of a molecule in the external electric field E is: \hat{H} = \frac{\hat{L^2}}{2I} - dE \cos{\theta}, where the polar angle \theta characterises the orientation of the molecule. (We have chosen the field direction as the angular momentum quantisation axis.) Let us find field-induced contribution to the ground-state energy.

Consider the action of the perturbation operator \hat{V} = −dE \cos{\theta} on the ground-state wave function Y_{00}. How does the function Y_{00} depend on angles? Use this to show that there is only one state which is coupled to the ground state by \hat{V}, the state with \ell = 1 and m = 0.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I have stated that Y_{00} does not depend on angles, but have no idea how to show that Y_{10} is the only state that couples with the ground state.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does it mean mathematically to say that a state ##Y_{l,m}## is coupled to the ground state ##Y_{0,0}## by ##\hat{V}##?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top