E-Potiential between 2 charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter IvaNMK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies why potential energy (PE) is positive for like charges and negative for opposite charges. When two charges of the same sign are brought closer, work must be done against the repulsive force, resulting in positive PE, as energy is stored when moving against the electric field. Conversely, with opposite charges, the attractive force pulls the charges together, requiring work to resist this pull, leading to negative PE. This concept parallels gravitational potential energy, where energy is defined based on the work done against forces. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the behavior of electric charges in fields.
IvaNMK
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I do not understand why the PE is positive when 2 charges are the same sign, and PE is negative when 2 charges are opposite signs

Picture

Homework Equations



W = - Delta PE

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how the how the forces go. What it means by +, - PE

Basically I don't understand the ppt

Plz help

http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/7026/9661766768304be98ca8f23oj9.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not understand why the PE is positive when 2 charges are the same sign, and PE is negative when 2 charges are opposite signs

Generally, like gravity, electrical potential energy is determined by the idea that you are bringing a charge from ∞.

If you had a backpack full of charges and you were walking in from say Topeka Kansas to another backpack full of charges on your table and they were the same sign, then as you get closer and closer you are going to feel the force more and more. That means that you are doing work against the E-Field of the charges sitting on the table. It is a force against the direction you are moving and we have defined work as the dot product of Force against the distance it moves.

If it takes positive work to get there, that means that it is stored as "potential" and if it were released, it would be accelerated away by the force back toward Topeka. So the convention is that it's positive PE for like charges.

For attractive forces the opposite is true. As you stroll in with your backpack of charges and you begin to get close to the table you will feel a pull in the direction you are moving. That pull is something that you have to resist pulling you closer. The work you have to do then is actually to keep it from going closer. And that's called -PE.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top