Ear Ossicles Amplification: Synovial Fluid Present

AI Thread Summary
Ear ossicles play a crucial role in amplifying sound despite the presence of synovial fluid in their joints. The synovial fluid, while reducing friction, does not significantly diminish sound transmission due to the greater speed of sound in bone compared to fluid. This creates an impedance mismatch at the boundary between the ossicles and synovial fluid, allowing sound to be effectively transmitted. The ossicles act as a conduit, utilizing the lever principle to amplify sound waves directed from the eardrum to the cochlea. This mechanism is similar to how other animals, lacking ossicles, use alternative structures to transmit sound to their cochleae, highlighting the importance of solid structures in sound conduction.
nishant34
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How do ear ossicles help in amplification even when there is synovial fluid present??

The ear ossicles help in amplification of received sound (right?). We know that the joint between the three ear ossicles is synovial joint. Therefore, we have synovial fluid to prevent friction.

This synovial fluid should also help to reduce the intensity of the sound that is transmitted forward.

So how do we say that the ear ossicles help in amplifying the sound waves??
 
Biology news on Phys.org


nishant34 said:
The ear ossicles help in amplification of received sound (right?). We know that the joint between the three ear ossicles is synovial joint. Therefore, we have synovial fluid to prevent friction.

This synovial fluid should also help to reduce the intensity of the sound that is transmitted forward.

So how do we say that the ear ossicles help in amplifying the sound waves??
I am guessing here, based on physics. The bulk modulus of bone is much greater than the bulk modulus of water. The density of bone and water are more comparable. Therefore, the speed of sound in bone is probably much greater than the speed of sound in water.
Therefore, the speed of sound in the ossicles is probably much greater than the speed of sound in the synovial fluid. Thus, there is an impedance mismatch at the boundary between the ossicles and the synovial fluid.
Sound bounces off the boundary between ossicles and synovial fluid. So the ossicles serve as a pipe for transmitting sounds collected by the ear drums to the cochlea. In addition, the lever principle provides the amplification of the sound of the ossicles.
I think that the impedance mismatch between body fluids and hard bone is comparable to the impedance mismatch between air and body fluids.
Animals without ossicles often use other types of bone to get the sound to the cochlear. For instance, in some fish the air bladder collects sound. Some other skull bones lead the sound through the skull to the cochlear. In crocodilians, the jaw collects the sound and the jaw bone transmits the sound to the cochlear. There is usually some bone that leads the sound through the skull to the cochlear. Rarely does the path involve body fluid alone.
 


THank you for your reply atyy and Darwin 123.

i really learned a few more new things. Thanks! :)
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top