Early attempts at determining the speed of sound?

AI Thread Summary
Early experiments to determine the speed of sound involved measuring the time it took for sound to travel a known distance, often using large fields and devices like bells. One notable method involved two people with lanterns separated by miles, attempting to synchronize their signals, although human error affected accuracy. Galileo's ideas in the 17th century laid groundwork for these measurements, with further developments occurring in the 19th century. The discussion also touched on the historical context of measuring the speed of light, highlighting the comparative understanding of sound and light speeds. Overall, the early attempts at measuring sound speed were rudimentary and influenced by observational techniques.
BigRedRod
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
As the title suggests, I'm curious about the first experiments to find the speed of sound and who developed/performed them. Who was the first to really have a good crack at it? And who came up with the equations to how it varies under differing conditions?

We hear all the time about other attempts at defining physical constants but I have no idea about this one (I'm aware it isn't really a constant, due to variation with air density and temperature, but still, you get my drift I'm sure)

So can anyone shed any light on this subject?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have a vague idea of it. My physics teacher last year told us a bit about it... shows how much I really paid attention... He said something about a large field with 1 guy at each end. One of them had a bell, or some other device that made a large sound. They measured the time for the sound to travel the distance of the field. I don't remember what their names were. Sorry I can't be of more help...
 
I am not exactly sure, but I know something about early attempts to measure light speed. They deduced that the speed of light was at least 8 times the speed of sound I think, but the experiment inherantly inaccurate as it realied on human reaction times.

I imagine early speed of sound experiments were similar...make a noise at the same time as make an optical signal. The speed of sound could easily be obtained.

As for equations under different conditions, I'm not sure on that one.
 
i believe the earliest test was done in about 1870 after an idea by Galileo. (All of that might be wrong but the next bit is true).

Two people were to have lanterns and they would get used to turning them on simulatious. They were then separated by about 3 miles, told to turn the lights on at almost the same time and then the time it took to get from on lantern to the other was measured by the time it took for the other person's lantern to be seen. The distance was too close and the human error was too great for it to be accurate.

Then there was another person that noticed the positions on Jupiter's Moons in relation to the Earth and noticed that they were behind schedule on month and ahead of it another. He predicted the speed of light to be 2.98 \times 10^8 ms^{-1}. The person that did this even told scientists that an eclipse of one of Jupiter's Moons would be 10 minutes late to what people thought and he was right.

The Bob (2004 ©)

P.S. If you really want more details I will have to get out of my chair and go and get my sheet from my physics class.
 
BoB:
are we talking about sound or light??

the first experiment finding speed of sound...Hm... I think it was done a couple thousands years ago... when our ancestor observse the sound of the lightning always come after the light... By dividing the distance where the lightning strike and the time lags between the light and sound, you will approximately calculate the speed of sound... with a very good accuracy
 
vincentchan said:
BoB:
are we talking about sound or light??
We are all allowed an off day. I am talking about light but he rest of you are not so I feel a little bit stupid :frown:

OH WELL :biggrin:

The Bob (2004 ©)
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

In what ways do high altitudes affect speed of sound?
Replies
3
Views
4K
Speed of sound as the sqrt(elasticity/density) and why it must always be < C
Replies
2
Views
3K
Unraveling the Mystery of the Speed of Sound
Replies
5
Views
4K
High pressure vs speed of sound?
Replies
1
Views
5K
Adiabatic Process and the speed of sound
Replies
4
Views
15K
Shockwave of mushroom cloud rising at supersonic speed
Replies
7
Views
2K
Speed of sound in steel dependance on temperature
Replies
1
Views
4K
Reading Russell's ABC of Relativity, stuck in chapter 3 (about speed of sound)
Replies
6
Views
2K
How come speed of sound is not releated to frequency and more?
Replies
13
Views
14K
Speed of bowling ball involving speed of sound
Replies
7
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top