Earth Mass: 5.9x10^24 kg - Last Measurement & Why?

  • Thread starter VASUbhagwat
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Earth Mass
In summary, the mass of the Earth has not increased even though the population of the word has gone up by many folds, there have been new flora and fauna, and the last measurement was taken a long time ago.
  • #1
VASUbhagwat
14
0
Mass of the Earth is 5.9 x 10^24 kg . How long has it been at this value and why does it not change even when the population of the word has gone up by many folds , there have been new flora and fauna . when was this last measurement taken?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi,

I have heard that the mass of Earth is increased a bit because of the debris coming from space (do not know exactly the extent of the increase).

The increase of population does not change the mass of the earth/biosphere, because the matter of a person is not generated during birth.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #3
Even if 7 billion aliens each with 100kg mass arrived from outer space, it wouldn't change the mass of the Earth to any significant degree.
 
  • #4
VASUbhagwat said:
why does it not change even when the population of the word has gone up by many folds , there have been new flora and fauna
Where does the matter making up living organism come from?

DoItForYourself said:
I have heard that the mass of Earth is increased a bit because of the debris coming from space (do not know exactly the extent of the increase).
Nasa said:
Every day, Earth is bombarded with more than 100 tons of dust and sand-sized particles.
Source: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/asteroids/overview/fastfacts.html
 
  • #5
Actually the Earth looses more mass than it gains because a bit of Atmosphere is blown away by the solar wind.

Anyways, the mass of the Earth is determined in a funny way. What you actually need to know is the constant of Gravitation G. It must be determined with test masses in a laboratory and it is only known to about four significant digits. The first one who did it was Henry Cavendish in 1798. The radius of the Earth was already known in ancient times. Once you have done all that, the gravitational acceleration on the ground g is given by g=G/r² m_E, which gives you the mass of the Earth.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
  • #6
yes g=GM/(r^2), does give the relation to determine the mass of the earth. But why does not the value of G change with times with so much of activities happening in the universe?? and when cavendish determined the value of G( i thought he was the one who determined the mass of the earth, stay my ignorance) in 1798...the entire population of the Earth was surely much less than what it is now...so does it lead us to a new determination of the value of G ?
 
  • #7
As other people already pointed out, there is generally a conservation of mass and the change of the Earth's mass over time is tiny compared to the total mass. And because G is not very well known you would have to crash a very large asteroid into Earth to make a change which is actually measurable as a change in Earths total mass.
 
  • Like
Likes Asymptotic and BillTre
  • #8
http://geodesy.curtin.edu.au/research/resolution/
Edit: change G to g - thanks phyzguy
Check out the image on the first page. A really cool map of very local g values (short scale gravity field), demonstrating that g is not a constant value over Earth's surface. For example, it varies by latitude. The changes are small, BTW.

The first image shows the effect of mountain ranges in Asia, another image further down shows Ayers Rock.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes smokingwheels
  • #9
jim mcnamara said:
http://geodesy.curtin.edu.au/research/resolution/

Check out the image on the first page. A really cool map of very local G values (short scale gravity field), demonstrating that G is not a constant value over Earth's surface. For example, it varies by latitude. The changes are small, BTW.

The first image shows the effect of mountain ranges in Asia, another image further down shows Ayers Rock.

G, the universal constant of gravitation, does not change. It is the acceleration of gravity g = GM/r^2 that is changing locally.
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213
  • #10
You are correct. Thanks.
 
  • #11
VASUbhagwat said:
Mass of the Earth is 5.9 x 10^24 kg . How long has it been at this value and why does it not change even when the population of the word has gone up by many folds , there have been new flora and fauna . when was this last measurement taken?
The new flora and fauna are not additional mass.
They are just new arrangements of existing atoms, most of which are in organic molecules.
Those molecules are there as byproducts of previous flora and fauna which died.
No new atoms are being created, matter is being recycled
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213 and smokingwheels
  • #12
You are what you eat!
 
  • Like
Likes smokingwheels, 1oldman2 and BillTre
  • #13
rootone said:
The new flora and fauna are not additional mass.
They are just new arrangements of existing atoms, most of which are in organic molecules.
Those molecules are there as byproducts of previous flora and fauna which died.
No new atoms are being created, matter is being recycled
Well I suppose everything is a rearrangement of existing atoms, and the mass of the Universe now is the same as at the moment of the Big Bang. [Sorry for being difficult].
 
  • Like
Likes rootone
  • #14
How about this for an answer:

We are all a portion of the Earth's total mass. Every person, every lifeform. Every breath we take, every drop of water. Just moving this planet's material about, from this continent to that one. Will have no measurable effect. You take four quarters from your pocket and move it to another pocket. You still have one dollar.

Even the space station. in such a close, protective orbit around the Earth, still contributes it's mass to the grand total of planetary mass.

It would take a stellar level cataclysmic effort to reduce the total mass of the Earth in any measurably substantial way.
 
  • #15
Ernest S Walton said:
Well I suppose everything is a rearrangement of existing atoms, and the mass of the Universe now is the same as at the moment of the Big Bang. [Sorry for being difficult].
Sure, conservation of mass=energy is generally considered to be true.
No new stuff appears from nowhere, and nothing mysteriously disappears.
 
  • Like
Likes Asymptotic
  • #16
Ernest S Walton said:
Well I suppose everything is a rearrangement of existing atoms, and the mass of the Universe now is the same as at the moment of the Big Bang. [Sorry for being difficult].

rootone said:
Sure, conservation of mass=energy is generally considered to be true.
No new stuff appears from nowhere, and nothing mysteriously disappears.
Actually energy is NOT conserved on cosmological scales and it does in fact disappear as EM waves lose energy due to the expansion of the universe.
 
  • Like
Likes rootone
  • #17
phinds said:
EM waves lose energy due to the expansion of the universe.
Well granted, but apart from that, what has the universe ever done for us?
 
  • #18
rootone said:
Well granted, but apart from that, what has the universe ever done for us?
In the grand scheme of things ... well ... chocolate.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, Kumar8434 and Bystander
  • #19
rootone said:
The new flora and fauna are not additional mass.
They are just new arrangements of existing atoms, most of which are in organic molecules.
Those molecules are there as byproducts of previous flora and fauna which died.
No new atoms are being created, matter is being recycled
Never trust atoms. They make up everything.
 
  • #20
we are now in the Comedy Show. While the jokes are fun and probably deserved, this thread longs for an ending. So here it is: locked.
 

1. What is Earth's mass and how is it measured?

Earth's mass is approximately 5.9x10^24 kg, which is equivalent to 5.9 followed by 24 zeros. This measurement is obtained using the Universal Gravitational Constant and Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. Scientists use this formula to calculate the mass of any object with known weight and distance from the object's center of mass.

2. How has Earth's mass been measured over time?

Throughout history, scientists have used various methods to measure Earth's mass. In the past, the most common method was through the use of pendulums, which allowed scientists to measure the gravitational pull of Earth. However, with advancements in technology, more accurate measurements can now be obtained using satellites and space probes.

3. What factors affect the measurement of Earth's mass?

The main factor that affects the measurement of Earth's mass is its varying gravitational pull due to its irregular shape and composition. The location of the measurement also plays a role, as the gravitational pull can differ depending on the altitude and location of the measurement. Additionally, external factors such as other celestial bodies and tectonic activity can also impact the measurement.

4. Why is it important to know Earth's mass?

Knowing Earth's mass is crucial for understanding the dynamics and evolution of our planet. It allows scientists to calculate the force of gravity on Earth's surface, which affects everything from the ocean tides to the movement of celestial bodies. Earth's mass also plays a significant role in our understanding of the solar system and our place in the universe.

5. How does Earth's mass compare to other planets?

Earth's mass is relatively small compared to other planets in our solar system. Jupiter, the largest planet, has a mass of 1.9x10^27 kg, over 300 times that of Earth. On the other hand, Mercury, the smallest planet, has a mass of 3.3x10^23 kg, about 18 times smaller than Earth. Earth's mass is also significantly smaller compared to the sun, which has a mass of 1.989x10^30 kg.

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
580
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
125
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
6
Views
679
  • Mechanics
6
Replies
202
Views
9K
Replies
44
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
753
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
955
Back
Top