Why Does the Earth Keep Spinning?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neo143
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Spinning
AI Thread Summary
The Earth continues to spin due to rotational inertia, as explained by Newton's first law, which states that an object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an external force. The atmosphere rotates with the planet, and there is no external friction in space to impede this motion. The initial rotation of the Earth originated from the coalescence of matter in a cloud of particles, which conserved angular momentum during its formation. As particles collided and merged, they retained residual tangential motion, leading to the planet's rotation. Understanding these principles clarifies why the Earth maintains its spin without needing an external reason.
neo143
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Why the Earth keeps on spinning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because it has rotational inertia. :wink: It's just Newton's 1st law applied to the rotational motion of a solid object. (In other words: It doesn't need a reason to keep spinning--that's what things do. But it would need a reason (a torque) to change its spinning.)
 
What about friction due to atmosphere??
 
Atmospheres are part of the planets that they're associated with, and as a basic rule rotate with them. There's nothing in space for the atmosphere to drag against. Winds are 'internal' phenomena of the system, caused by convection, and aren't reflective of the planet's motion.
 
Better the question-What initiated the Earth to be in a state of spinning? Why did Earth start rotating around its axis when it was formed? Can anyone here clear my doubt?
 
The coalescence of matter into a body will conserve the angular momentum of its individual parts. The Earth did not "start rotating", the Earth was a cloud of particles, rocks and gas, in a loose orbit around a cloud of particles rocks and gas that was to become the Sun and the rest of the Solar System. It was already rotating before it formed.


Where does the rotation come from in the first place?

1] Take two particles in empty space.
2] Give them each a random velocity in a random direction.
3] Place them close enough so that they gravitationally interact.
4] When they eventually collide, they will not exactly cancel each others' motion out (There is only a single, astronomically small chance of this happening - it requires both particles to collide with each other in a direct line, with no tangential motion relative to each other i.e. they were on a collision course to begin with). So, when they collide, they will stick together. They will retain any residual tangential motion that doesn't completely cancel out. This effect is cumulative.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top