Easy (but not to me) Modern Algebra Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter c.francis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Proof
c.francis
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I am hoping that someone can please give me some help with this homework problem.

Homework Statement


In n>2 is a Carmichael number and p/n is an odd prime, then show that gcd(p-1,n-1) >1


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I did, but I am not sure if its right:

Choose an a coprime to n and that does not divide p (2 will work because p is prime and carmichael numbers are odd).

Then ap-1 \equiv1 (mod p) (by Fermats Little Theorem) and an-1 \equiv1 (mod n) by definition. This implies that an-1 \equiv1 (mod p) because p/n.

So to finish can I just say that because ap-1 \equiv1 (mod p) and an-1 \equiv1 (mod p) this implies that ap-1^some integer=an-1, and so (p-1)/(n-1)?


Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about this revised version, is this right?

Choose an a coprime to n and that does not divide p (2 will work because p is prime and carmichael numbers are odd).

Then by FLT, ap-1\equiv1 (mod p), and by definition an-1\equiv1 (mod n). Then because p/n, an-1\equiv1 (mod p). Now this implies that the order of a mod p (which cannot be 1 because that would mean a is 1 and 1 isn't coprime to n and does divide p) divides both n-1 and p-1. Thus the gcd(n-1,p-1) is greater than 1.
 
I haven't really had a lot of time to think about this, but stop writing p/n instead of p|n. (i.e. p divides n). It confused me right off the bat, and may confuse other people. Who might know number theory a lot better than I do.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top