Easy Energy Conservation. Spring, Incline/Ramp, Friction.

AI Thread Summary
A crate on an incline is propelled by a compressed spring, raising questions about energy conservation during its motion. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between spring potential energy, gravitational potential energy, and frictional work. A participant notes an error in calculating the normal force, which should reflect units of force rather than mass. After revising their approach, they express gratitude for assistance in clarifying the physics concepts involved. The conversation highlights the challenges of aligning mathematical calculations with physical principles in energy conservation scenarios.
mcleanrs
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Question for search purposes:

A crate is placed against a compressed spring on an incline. When the spring is released, the crate moves up the ramp and comes to a stop.

How far was the spring compressed?

Hint: The mass and the spring may not be in contact at the end.

13-2-q.png

13-2-1.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation for energy conservation looks okay. I would have formulated it as:

spring elastic potential energy lost = grav. potential energy gained + work done by friction

which is a slightly more intuitive ordering to me.

It looks like you forgot a factor of g in your expression for the normal force, which should of course end up having units of force, not mass.
 
Thanks for your help. I agree that they were ordered funny -- but by the time I realized that, I was feeling too lazy to redo my diagram!

Anyway, I tweaked some things, and now my answer is even further off! I am being tested on this Monday, so I appreciate the help...got to figure these concepts out!

I just double and triple checked this for accuracy...I am getting exactly what my math is telling me I should get, so I must have set something up wrong or something.

13-2-2.png


Hold it -- duh. Hold it. Got my spring equation off a little.
 
Solution

13-2-3.png
 
Glad to see you sorted it out.
 
Yeah, thanks for the help. It's hard to wander through the algebra forest looking for mistakes when you're not even sure your Physics is right ;)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top