I Eccentric anomaly of ellipse-circle intersections

Marko7
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I want to calculate eccentric anomaly of all points of ellipse-circle intersection.
Ellipse is not rotated and its center is in origin.
Circle can be translated to (Cx, Cy) coordinates.
I am using python for calculations.

Only solution I found, is this:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3419984/find-the-intersection-of-a-circle-and-an-ellipse
And I implemented it in my code. I avoided calculating polynomial roots manually by using numpy's solver.

[CODE lang="python" title="ellipse_circle.py"]import numpy as np

def ellipse_circle(a, b, c_x, c_y, r):
"""Calculate eccentric anomalies of intersecting points
on non-rotated ellipse in origin, and translated circle"""

# quartic equation coefficients
a_4 = a**2 * (c_y**2 - b**2) + b**2 * (c_x - r)**2
a_3 = 4 * a**2 * r * c_y
a_2 = 2 * (a**2 * (c_y**2 - b**2 + 2*r**2) + b**2 * (c_x**2 - r**2))
a_1 = 4 * a**2 * r * c_y
a_0 = a**2 * (c_y**2 - b**2) + b**2 * (c_x + r)**2

# quartic equation roots
roots = np.polynomial.polynomial.polyroots([a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4])

# take only non-complex roots
real_roots = np.real(roots[np.isreal(roots)])

return real_roots % (2*np.pi)[/CODE]

I tested it on some simple example:
>>> ellipse_circle(5, 2.17945, 4.5, 0, 1)
array([5.22599703, 1.05718828])

But those two roots are not eccentric anomalies of intersection points, as can be seen here (Point D is real intersection, and point A is calculated one):
image.png

So, what am I doing wrong, how can I calculate eccentric anomaly?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You are calculating values for the parameter z \in \mathbb{R} in the parametrization of the circle (x-x_c)^2 + (y-y_c)^2 = r^2 as
\begin{split}<br /> x = x_c + r \frac{1 - z^2}{1 + z^2} \\<br /> y = y_c + r \frac{2z}{1 + z^2}. \end{split} z is not an angle, so I do not think it is necessary or correct to return these modulo 2\pi, as your program does (see line 20). Replace line 20 with
Python:
   return real_roots
and see if it does any better.

EDIT: Note that the point (x_c - R, y_c) is attained only in the limit |z| \to \infty; this corresponds to the coefficient of z^4 vanishing. You can test this case by setting cx = -0.5, cy = 0, r = 0.5, a = b = 1.

I also now see from your diagram that you have misinterpreted the root 5.22 as being an angle in radians about the origin (5.22 rad ~ 299 deg); it is not. You need to use the above parametrization of the circle to recover the x and y coordinates. The eccentric anomaly can then be calculated as <br /> \arccos\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - b^2/a^2}}\left(1 - \frac{\sqrt{(x-ae)^2 + y^2}}{a}\right)\right) as shown here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Marko7 and e_jane
I had no idea that parameter is from circle.
I thought that parameter ##z## is same as parameter ##t## as used in normal parametric equations.

Here is working code if anyone in future needs it:
[CODE lang="python" title="ellipse_circle.py"]
import numpy as np
def ellipse_circle(a, b, c_x, c_y, r):
"""Calculate eccentric anomalies of intersecting points
on non-rotated ellipse in origin, and translated circle"""
# quartic equation coefficients
a_0 = a**2 * (c_y**2 - b**2) + b**2 * (c_x + r)**2
a_1 = 4 * a**2 * r * c_y
a_2 = 2 * (a**2 * (c_y**2 - b**2 + 2*r**2) + b**2 * (c_x**2 - r**2))
a_3 = 4 * a**2 * r * c_y
a_4 = a**2 * (c_y**2 - b**2) + b**2 * (c_x - r)**2

# quartic equation roots
roots = np.polynomial.polynomial.polyroots([a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4])
# take only non-complex roots
real_roots = np.real(roots[np.isreal(roots)])

if any(real_roots):
# calculate x and y coordinates
x = c_x + r * (1-real_roots**2) / (1 + real_roots**2)
y = c_y + r * 2 * real_roots / (1 + real_roots**2)
ecc = np.sqrt(1-(b**2/a**2))
# eccentric anomaly
ea = np.arccos((1/np.sqrt(1-(b**2)/a**2)) * (1-(np.sqrt((x-a*ecc)**2 + y**2)/a)))
ea = np.where(real_roots < 0, 2*np.pi-ea, ea) # quadrant corrections
return ea
else:
return np.array([])
[/CODE]
Note: because of square roots in line 23, calculated angle is in range (0, ##\pi##), which is corrected in line 24.
Resulting eccentric anomaly is in range (0, ##2\pi##).

In my simulation it is very unlikely that this edge case with ##z^4## coefficient being zero will occur, so I just omitted it to save computation time.

Thanks. Helped a lot!
 
Thinking again, it is simpler to obtain the anomaly from (x,y) as
Python:
np.arctan2(np.sign(y)*np.sqrt(a**2 - x**2),x)
since the auxiliary circle of the ellipse is x^2 + y^2 = a^2.

EDIT: Simpler still is
Code:
atan2((a/b)*y, x)
since (x,y) \mapsto (x,(a/b)y) maps the ellipse (a\cos\theta, b\sin \theta) to the circle (a \cos \theta, a \sin \theta).
 
Last edited:
A further refinement is to parametrize the ellipse, rather than the circle, as \begin{split}<br /> x &amp;= a\frac{1 - z^2}{1 + z^2} \\<br /> y &amp;= b\frac{2z}{1 + z^2} \end{split} and then the values of z at the points of intersection are the roots of P(z) = \sum_{n=0}^4 a_nz^n = 0 where <br /> \begin{split}<br /> a_0 &amp;= a^{2} - 2 a c_{x} + c_{x}^{2} + c_{y}^{2} - r^{2} \\<br /> a_1 &amp;= - 4 b c_{y} \\<br /> a_2 &amp;= - 2 a^{2} + 4 b^{2} + 2 c_{x}^{2} + 2 c_{y}^{2} - 2 r^{2} \\<br /> a_3 &amp;= - 4 b c_{y} \\<br /> a_4 &amp;= a^{2} + 2 a c_{x} + c_{x}^{2} + c_{y}^{2} - r^{2}<br /> \end{split} The anomalies are then obtained by
Python:
[
    np.atan2(2*z, 1.0 - z**2 ) for z in roots if np.isreal(z)
]
with the addition of \pi if the degree of P is less than 4.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top