Eccentricity of elliptical path of earth

AI Thread Summary
The eccentricity of Earth's orbit is 0.0167, and the ratio of maximum speed (v1) to minimum speed (v2) in its orbit is incorrectly calculated as 1.00014 based on the semi-major and semi-minor axes. The correct approach involves using the distances from the Sun at aphelion and perihelion, leading to the ratio of maximum to minimum speeds being (1+e)/(1-e), which equals approximately 1.0340. This correction is crucial because the Sun is located at one focus of the ellipse, not at the center. Understanding this relationship is essential for applying Kepler's laws to elliptical orbits.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
Sir,
The eccentricity of Earth's orbit is 0.0167. What is the ratio of its maximum speed to its minimum speed in its orbit?
I solved it in the following way:
Let its maximum and minimum speed be v1 and v2 respectively. Let a and b be the semi length of the major and minor axis respectively. Let e be its eccentricity.
v is inversely proportional to a and b. I took this assumption because at points closest to the centre of the elliptical path the velocity is maximum.
Hence,
v1/v2 = a/b
Now for an ellipse, (1 – e^2) = (b/a)^2
By solving I get,
a/b = 1.00014
Therefore,
v1/v2 = 1.00014
But the book answer is 1.033. Is there any mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amith2006 said:
Sir,
The eccentricity of Earth's orbit is 0.0167. What is the ratio of its maximum speed to its minimum speed in its orbit?
I solved it in the following way:
Let its maximum and minimum speed be v1 and v2 respectively. Let a and b be the semi length of the major and minor axis respectively. Let e be its eccentricity.
v is inversely proportional to a and b. I took this assumption because at points closest to the centre of the elliptical path the velocity is maximum.
Hence,
v1/v2 = a/b
Now for an ellipse, (1 – e^2) = (b/a)^2
By solving I get,
a/b = 1.00014
Therefore,
v1/v2 = 1.00014
But the book answer is 1.033. Is there any mistake?


Your mistake is in assuming that the v1 and V2 are porportional to a and b. They are instead proportional to rap and rper, which are the aphelion and perhelion of the orbit, the furthest distance and closest approach the orbit has to the Sun. (these are not equal to a and b. Since the Sun is located at one of the foci of the elipse and not the center.)

The aphelion is found by
r_{ap}= a(1+e)
and the perhelion by
r_{per}= a(1-e)
 
Amith2006 said:
Sir,
The eccentricity of Earth's orbit is 0.0167. What is the ratio of its maximum speed to its minimum speed in its orbit?
I solved it in the following way:
Let its maximum and minimum speed be v1 and v2 respectively. Let a and b be the semi length of the major and minor axis respectively. Let e be its eccentricity.
v is inversely proportional to a and b. I took this assumption because at points closest to the centre of the elliptical path the velocity is maximum.
Hence,
v1/v2 = a/b
Now for an ellipse, (1 – e^2) = (b/a)^2
By solving I get,
a/b = 1.00014
Therefore,
v1/v2 = 1.00014
But the book answer is 1.033. Is there any mistake?
But a/b is not the ratio of maximum to minimum radii. A planet prescribes an orbit about the sun with the sun at one of the focii. So the ratio of max radius to min radius is: (1+e)/(1-e), which is 1.0340

Since angular momentum is conserved:

mvr = constant

Therefore: v \propto 1/r

So this is also the ratio of maximum to minimum speeds.

AM
 
You can prove yourself that

V_{max} = \sqrt{\frac{GM}{a}\left(\frac{1+e}{1-e}\right)}

V_{min} = \sqrt{\frac{GM}{a}\left(\frac{1-e}{1+e}\right)}

This would be a good exercise in Kepler's Laws and elliptic orbits for you :smile:
 
Andrew's approach to your question can also be derived from Kepler's second law as follows:
\frac{dA_{ap}}{dt}=\frac{dA_{per}}{dt}

\frac{r_{ap}ds_{ap}}{2dt}=\frac{r_{per}ds_{per}}{2dt}

r_{ap}v_{ap}=r_{per}v_{per}
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top