Economic physical methods for surface treatment of plastics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on improving the mechanical strength of a plastic-based composite made from reprocessed polyethylene and cement. The initial bonding issues between the plastic and cement led to the exploration of physical surface treatment methods. While abrasion with sandpaper was attempted, it did not yield significant strength improvements. The focus is on finding economical physical methods for surface treatment, as chemical treatments and techniques like Corona treatment are deemed too costly. Suggestions include flame treatment, specifically flame polishing, followed by light abrasion. Additionally, inquiries are made about the type of cement used and whether any additives are incorporated, indicating that these factors could also influence the bonding and overall strength of the composite.
sm.malkapur
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
"economic physical methods" for surface treatment of plastics

I am a material science student, working on a plastic based composite (reprocessed polyethylene solid form, mixed with cement). Initially, the mechanical strength of composite was lesser, probably because of the poor bond characteristics of plastic with cement.

So to improve composite’s strength, i used some physical surface treatment methods (surface made rough by abrading with sand paper) on my plastics, so that I can improve its bond characteristics, but i did not get much improvements in strength.

I can’t go for chemical treatment. Surface treatment methods like “Corona treatment” will be a bit uneconomical for me. Hence, I want to know, are there any alternative "economic physical methods" that can be effectively used for surface treatment of plastics.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org


You might try flame treatment (flame polishing) followed by light abrasion. What kind of cement are you using and are you using any additives in the cement?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top