Economics: Forcing Interest Rates Low

AI Thread Summary
National legislation mandating lower mortgage interest rates could lead to significant consequences for the lending landscape. It may result in a decreased willingness among lenders to issue loans, increased transactional costs, and a tendency to avoid high-risk borrowers. If lenders are restricted from adjusting their practices, the banking industry could face a collapse within six months, leading to an oligopoly where remaining lenders engage in rent-seeking behavior. This would involve lending to low-risk customers at rates above competitive levels but below the legislated maximum. The fixed costs associated with forced loans would not substantially change lender behavior, but high-risk borrowers might take on excessive risk, leading to higher default rates. Additionally, the legislation could encourage offshore lending institutions to target low-risk customers, prompting domestic lenders to establish offshore operations and seek to limit competition from foreign lenders.
Phrak
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
7
ECONOMICS

"Any legislation to force intestest rates lower will probable have to wait for a new president."

This is a quote from the talking heads at ABC news (ABC World News).

What would be the effects of national legislation forcing mortgage lenders, by law, to make loans at a lower rate?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Phrak said:
What would be the effects of national legislation forcing mortgage lenders, by law, to make loans at a lower rate?

Decreased willingness to lend, increase of transactional costs (to effectively raise the rates), further pressure to avoid lending to high-risk customers. If these options are not available (perhaps the legislation forbids them) then further collapse of the banking industry would be the likeliest outcome, though probably not for at least 6 months. This would continue until the oligopoly power of the remaining lenders increases to the point that the rent-seeking behavior (in this case, lending to low-risk customers at rates above the natural/competitive rate but at or below the legislated maximum and also at or below the monopoly price) offsets the profit loss from the forced loans.

The cost of forced loans to the companies would be a fixed price, a net transfer, which would not greatly alter their behavior (except indirectly, though failed companies) -- a good thing. It would, however, alter the behavior of high-risk customers, who would consume (relative to the natural/market conditions) 'too much' risk and consequently default more often than in that case.
 
CRGreathouse said:
...in this case, lending to low-risk customers at rates above the natural/competitive rate but at or below the legislated maximum and also at or below the monopoly price

I hadn't thought of that... Well done.

So the lower risk parties obtaining loans will pick up the tab for higher risk parties. This would tend to attract offshore lending institutions to seek-out low risk customers. Given the motivation, there should be a means to circumvent any preexisting federal legislation.

This would motivate lenders to set-up offshore operations themselves, and at the same time seek legislation to curtail foreign lenders (new competitors, in any case), I would think.
 
Last edited:
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top