What is the Edwin V. Gray EMA Motor and how does it work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Cheese
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motor
AI Thread Summary
The Edwin V. Gray EMA Motor has raised skepticism due to its association with concepts often linked to perpetual motion. The discussion highlights the difficulty in finding credible explanations for its operation, as the terminology used in related articles is unclear and potentially misleading. Participants emphasize that without peer-reviewed validation, discussions about such technologies are discouraged in the forum. The conversation reflects a broader concern about the proliferation of unverified claims in the field of alternative energy. Ultimately, the need for credible scientific backing is underscored in evaluating the legitimacy of the motor.
Mr Cheese
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys!

First post, hope it's in the right place.

Ok so here's the deal. A friend of mine sent me an article about Edwin V. Gray's Electromagnetic Association Motor. It looks pretty suspicious to me (a perpetual motion thing) but I couldn't find any accessible explanation on how it works so I can't really make any comment on it. (The article uses terms like 'casual positron energy' and 'splitting the positive').

Does anybody know anything about it? If so could you tell me if it's a hoax or just an incredibly efficient engine and give some kind of explanation on how it works or doesn't work using well defined terms.

Thanks in anticipation!

-Mr Cheese
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unfortunately, perpetual motion machines is a banned topic for this forum (there's a long history of it).

If it isn't published in peer-reviewed journals and been verified, we cannot discuss it on here. It attracts way too many crackpots.

Zz.
 
@ZapperZ

I'm not suggesting it is perpetual motion. I'm just trying to get information about it.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top