Effect of Adding a Third Resistor in Parallel on Series Circuit Current

  • Thread starter Thread starter Romperstomper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits Current
AI Thread Summary
When a third resistor R3 is added in parallel to resistor R2, the equivalent resistance (Req) of the parallel combination decreases compared to R2 alone. This reduction in resistance leads to an increase in the total current flowing through R1, as per Ohm's Law (V=I*R). Since the voltage from the emf source remains constant and the overall resistance of the circuit decreases, the current through R1 must increase.
Romperstomper
Resistors R1 and R2 are connected in series to an emf source that has negligible internal resistance. What happens to the current through R1 when a third resistor R3 is added in parallel to R2?

I think it will go up because the Req of R3 and R2 in parallel will be lower than R2. Since V=I*R, if R decreases, then I must increase. Is this true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is true.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top